A cartoon on today's page accurately reflects the state of affairs in
Columbia on property tax relief. Even some of the strongest advocates in the
Senate have come to the realization that there's little chance of homeowner
relief this year. That's primarily because anything meaningful will require a
two-thirds vote of each legislative body.
The Senate finally passed a measure last week that would allow each county to
hold a local option referendum, but it's a far cry from the original version
advocated by Charleston Sen. Chip Campsen. Indeed, Sen. Campsen tells us he
voted for it only to allow the conference committee a chance to try its hand at
a resolution. The problem, he said, is that it requires that any relief granted
by a sales tax increase to be across the board for all classes of property.
Generally, that requirement would result in a sales tax increase so high that
voters would never approve it, he said.
The House-passed bill calls for a statewide two-cent sales tax increase that
would be used to remove all the property tax from single- family homes. But Sen.
Glenn McConnell, president pro tempore of the Senate, says previous court
rulings tell him that the House bill would require a two-thirds vote, as did the
measure that passed the Senate. The votes in the Senate over the past few weeks
say that support for such a statewide increase just isn't there. It is, he said,
"reality time."
According to Sen. Campsen, property tax relief isn't viewed by many senators
as a statewide problem. In counties where property values aren't escalating as
they are along the coast, there is little interest in a substantial statewide
sales tax increase. The matter is complicated by the fact that some senators are
concentrating on equity in school funding and want to tie that to any property
tax change. Sen. Campsen says those concentrating on the school funding problem
are willing to hold property tax relief "hostage" until the equity issue is
resolved.
Sen. McConnell does believe a proposed constitutional amendment that caps
real property reassessments to 3 percent per year after 2007 will make it on the
ballot. That measure has gotten the needed two-thirds vote in the Senate and is
in the House.
The senator also says a bill establishing a study committee on property tax
relief is in the making. That's a measure we've been advocating all year.
Property tax relief is far more complicated than tort reform, for example, and
that legislation took several years of debate before passage. The same goes for
equity in school funding. The inequity in existing funding formulas speaks to
the extent of that problem.
This session should have been a wake-up for all those who sought so-called
simple solutions to the property tax problem. All the alternatives and their
consequences, intended and otherwise, should be thoroughly analyzed by outside
experts before changes are proposed. If legislators finally have come to that
realization, that's progress.