Corrections
spending plan continues pattern of neglect
By JON
OZMINT Guest
columnist
During the past several years of revenue shortfalls, I have not
been a vocal critic of the cuts that the S.C. Department of
Corrections has been forced to endure, even when some agencies
received increases. I have been criticized for that, and I accept
responsibility for that decision.
At Corrections, we recognized the difficulties that legislators
confronted. We did not play the blame game. Because complaining and
excuses breed complaining and excuses, we chose to focus all our
energy and resources on fulfilling our mission of safety, service
and stewardship. We will continue to do so.
This year, the budget bill passed by the S.C. House contains more
than $600 million in new spending. I commend House budget writers
for finding a way to fund a long-overdue pay raise for law
enforcement in South Carolina.
Even with that raise for our security staff, however, the House
budget would result in a $6.8 million cut in operational funds at
Corrections. On the other hand, Gov. Mark Sanford’s executive budget
not only proposes a mechanism to provide a pay raise for our law
enforcement officers, but it proposes more than $17 million in new
operational funding for Corrections.
During the past five years, our Legislature has cut funding for
Corrections lower than any other state’s. While South Carolina ranks
19th in the nation in spending per child on education, we rank 50th
in funding per inmate. Such continuing neglect of this essential
function of state government is shortsighted and dangerous.
Unlike some government functions, measuring efficiency and costs
in corrections is not difficult or subject to a great deal of
interpretation. We spend $12,170 annually per inmate. It is telling
that even as other states have experienced budget difficulties, no
other legislative body has taken such great risk in funding
corrections. For example, North Carolina spends more than $23,000
per inmate.
In order to maintain a safe system at the lowest spending level
in the nation, this agency has reached record levels of efficiency.
We now produce our own eggs, milk, grits and meal; our inmates
repair state vehicles so that we can buy parts for our aging fleet;
we even save $1 million annually by ensuring that we pay no more
than state health plan rates for outside medical care. From food
costs to medical care to prison industry, we lead the nation in
efficiency.
While we are efficient, funding neglect has pushed our
inmate-to-staff ratios to the worst levels in the nation. During the
past five years, Corrections employees have risen to the challenge
of managing thousands of additional inmates with 1,400 fewer
employees. Much of our infrastructure and equipment, including
essential security equipment, is old and in need of repair. A large
portion of our equipment is beyond repair. We transport hundreds of
inmates each day in worn-out vehicles with more than 200,000 miles.
We are unable to repair or replace equipment and infrastructure,
including food preparation equipment and critical security equipment
such as fences and razor wire.
Even with reasonable levels of funding, bad things happen in
prison. At our spending levels, ignoring our operational needs this
year will jeopardize our ability to maintain a safe and
constitutionally acceptable prison system. And in the long term, if
we continue to put more pressure on limited staff and worn-out
equipment and infrastructure, the odds will catch up with us,
resulting in tragedy.
Unless the Senate provides operational funding, 500 of our 800
addictions treatment units will be closed. There will be no
addictions treatment for women or for 17- to 28-year-old men. I can
think of no better formula to increase recidivism than closing those
operations.
I recognize that prisons have no constituency. Ignoring
Corrections will always be easy and will draw little public
opposition. Our citizens and lawmakers clearly believe that prison
should be a difficult place. I agree, and in South Carolina, prison
is a difficult place.
We do not seek to waste money on programming for inmates who do
not comply with our rules and have no desire to help themselves. But
for those inmates who demonstrate a desire to change by their
behavior and attitude, it is shortsighted and mean-spirited to offer
nothing.
Casting aside willing inmates speaks volumes about a society.
However, if we continue to fall farther behind the nation in
correctional spending, we will have to eliminate all programming
just to pay for basic security. Our prisons will become warehouses.
I pray that we never reach that point.
Mr. Ozmint is the director of the S.C. Department of
Corrections. |