S.C. audits 7 golf
courses, 3 other sites over U.S. law
By Noelle
Phillips Knight
Ridder
COLUMBIA - Seven golf courses and three
other pieces of property are being audited by the S.C. Department of
Revenue to see whether their owners abused a federal law intended to
open land for public use or to save pristine environments.
All the golf courses are private and the five largest are in
exclusive gated communities, said Burnie Maybank, S.C. Department of
Revenue director.
Combined, the owners of the 10 properties could be claiming
millions of dollars in federal charitable tax deductions, Maybank
said. The landowners are receiving millions of dollars in state tax
deductions as well.
Eventually, the audit could result in the property owners paying
back taxes for every year they benefited from the deductions,
Maybank said. The Revenue Department also could seek negligence
penalties or open civil fraud cases.
"I can tell you there are cases where we will seek charitable
fraud," Maybank said.
Maybank testified about the abuse of conservation easements June
8 before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee. In his statement, he
addressed abuse by golf courses and real estate developers.
"I seriously question whether the U.S. Treasury should subsidize
any golf course development, public or private," Maybank said. "In
particular, I do not believe the U.S. Congress ever intended to give
huge charitable deductions for the preservation of a golf course in
an exclusive gated community."
In a conservation easement, the landowner agrees with a nonprofit
group to restrict development of the property.
In exchange, the owner receives a tax break while keeping and
using the land. The nonprofit is responsible for making sure
easement terms are followed.
The land is supposed to meet certain needs, such as public
recreation or preservation of a unique habitat, such as Lowcountry
wetland where ospreys, woodpeckers, alligators and other wildlife
live.
There are instances where golf courses could qualify, but Maybank
does not think the links in gated communities fit the bill.
Developers are watching the federal government to see if changes
are made.
Earl McLeod, executive director of the Homebuilders Association
of Greater Columbia, said the easements have been good for
developers who use them to keep open space in communities.
"It's a viable tool for developers, and it's good for the
community," he said.
Maybank's department began its investigation after the Washington
Post published articles about abuses around the country. At the same
time, the Internal Revenue Service is cracking down on the abuse,
and Congress is considering legislation to curb the practice.
The state Revenue Department first examined 110 easements worth
more than $1 million each. The easements were granted between 2001
and 2003, Maybank said. The department is in the early stages of
looking at another 50 easements, he said.
So far, the 160 easements under examination give landowners the
potential to collect more than $300 million in federal charitable
tax deductions, Maybank said.
In his report to Congress, Maybank said the instances of abuse
were few but result in millions of dollars in lost tax revenue when
they occur. Hence, an audit of the 10 properties.
Maybank could not release the names of the golf courses or other
landowners because of privacy laws. He did say in testimony that the
majority of golf course and developer easements seemed to involve
the same land trust and some of the same appraisers and
consultants. |