Indictment
highlights weak S.C. cockfighting law
By WAYNE
PACELLE Guest
columnist
The indictment of state Commissioner of Agriculture Charles
Sharpe on charges that he solicited and accepted payments from
cockfighters, and provided protection for them, signifies a change
in attitudes about an illegal activity that has been generally
handled in the past with a wink and a nod.
It is noteworthy that one government official might have proved
himself unsuited to his position. But the encouraging part of the
story is that Aiken Sheriff Michael Hunt, U.S. Attorney J. Strom
Thurmond Jr. and other South Carolina law enforcement officials have
proven themselves worthy of the public trust by treating Sharpe’s
alleged misconduct as the abetting of a serious criminal enterprise
— organized, illegal cockfighting in South Carolina. It’s an
important moment, especially in a state sometimes known as the home
of the fighting Gamecocks.
U.S. Attorney Thurmond indicted Sharpe on charges that he
solicited and accepted payments from South Carolina cockfighters in
exchange for information about a pending investigation of their
activities. To the Humane Society of the United States, law-breaking
by cockfighters is what we expect from them. Cockfighting interests
make a daily habit of flouting both state and federal laws. They
come up with one creative ruse after another to mask their true
aims, claiming to conduct agricultural research, show gamefowl, and
“test” birds, when their real intent is unmistakable: to stage
bloody fights between animals armed with razor-sharp implements on
their legs.
The principal problem in South Carolina is not the possible
corruptibility of public officials, however. It is the state’s weak
law on cockfighting. The penalty for cockfighting is a misdemeanor
ticket and a maximum fine of $100.
The national campaign to halt cockfighting has seen many recent
victories: Since 1997, a total of 14 states, including Arizona,
Florida, Missouri and Oklahoma, in which the sport has traditionally
flourished, have upgraded penalties for cockfighting. In 2003, a new
federal law took effect that banned any interstate transport of
fighting animals.
But the gains have been uneven. A number of states, such as
Alabama, Arkansas and South Carolina, still treat cockfighting with
the same degree of seriousness as they do a parking violation. In
two states — Louisiana and New Mexico — cockfighting is still
legal.
The weakness of South Carolina’s law, and the lax attitude of
many state officials and law enforcement agencies, have made it a
national refuge for cockfighting enthusiasts. One of the national
cockfighting subscription magazines, Grit & Steel, is actually
published in Gaffney. And an organized criminal network of
cockfighters in the state stages illegal fights and sells birds to
other cockfighters throughout the country, and indeed across the
globe. A review of just one issue of Grit & Steel reveals
multiple advertisements from cockfighters selling birds from $100 to
$1,000 per bird.
Cockfighting is a social evil with demonstrable associations to
violence and, in many instances, clandestine associations to drug
dealing and illegal gambling. The presence of children at such
events is particularly disturbing, as impressionable minds are left
with the thought that adults consider it acceptable to watch animals
hack one another to death, and to gamble on the outcome.
Nor is cockfighting a “victimless” crime. It is a cruel and
bloody pursuit whose explicit object — the injury and killing of
animals merely for human entertainment — contradicts standards of
decency and empathy for other creatures. This spectacle has no real
winners, as the hyper-aggressive birds gouge and hack one another,
puncture lungs, and inflict other wounds in their fights to the
death.
Citizens of South Carolina can be proud of public officials who
have ably discharged their duties under state and federal law. But
more needs to be done. A state law needs to be passed to make
cockfighting a felony offense, in order to provide a real deterrent
to individuals who would otherwise engage in the activity and treat
the existing penalties as a minor cost of doing business. The
barbaric practice of cockfighting should receive no protection under
the law.
Mr. Pacelle is the chief executive officer of the Humane Society
of the United
States. |