Study: School tax
credit bill would cost state millions
PAMELA
HAMILTON Associated
Press
COLUMBIA, S.C. - Giving tax breaks for paying
private school tuition would cost South Carolina as much as $231
million in revenue in five years if legislation now in the
Statehouse becomes law, according to a study released Tuesday by
economists.
The fiscal impact study on the Put Parents in Charge Act from the
state Board of Economic Advisors dampened arguments from school
choice supporters that the bill would save the state millions of
dollars and caused concern among some legislators who support the
bill.
"Unless we can see on the other side where there's going to be a
savings, that's going to be a problem," Rep. Shirley Hinson, R-Goose
Creek, said. Hinson, one of the bill's co-sponsors, said she was
waiting on a rebuttal to some of the study's findings from Gov. Mark
Sanford's office.
The study showed the tax credits would cost the state's general
revenue $29 million for the 2006-07 fiscal year. The bill would cost
$231 million at the end of five years when it is fully
implemented.
The study also showed modest savings of nearly $10.6 million at
the state level, but found local communities would have to find a
way to make up the difference.
"That translates into a tax increase," said Hinson, whose
subcommittee passed the bill last week. "And that translates into a
no, pretty simply."
The average tax credit for parents would be $1,462 per student or
less. It could be as little as $806 for parents with less income,
according to the study.
The study was requested by the House Ways and Means Committee
members, who wanted estimates on how the Put Parents in Charge Act
would affect state revenues. The full committee plans to take up the
bill next week. The legislation would allow parents to claim tax
credits for paying tuition and other costs for private schools, home
schooling or public schools.
The Board of Economic Advisors' study contradicted a report by
Clemson University economist Cotton Lindsey, who found that the
state would save hundreds of millions of dollars the first year the
bill was implemented.
"It truly supports and underscores what we've been saying about
potential impact," said Scott Price, a lobbyist with the South
Carolina School Boards Association. Price's group and the South
Carolina Association of School Administrators paid for a study that
showed the bill would cost public schools hundreds of millions of
dollars.
That study was written by Harry Miley, a former economic adviser
to former Republican Govs. Carroll Campbell and David Beasley.
The Board of Economic Advisors are the state's chief financial
consultants and continually review tax and other revenue collections
as well as estimating the fiscal impact of all legislation.
The board's study did find that per-pupil spending would increase
if the bill is implemented.
"We find that to be a good thing in itself," said Sanford's
spokesman Will Folks, who said the office had only reviewed the
highlights of the study. "Obviously, we'll be taking a close look at
it."
The study estimated that tax credits would be claimed for more
than 12,000 students. Most of those students would be home-schooled
children and those entering private schools, not students
transferring from public schools.
The study also found that wealthier parents would benefit most
from the tax credits. A family of four with two children would have
to make about $35,000 in taxable income - about $55,000 in gross
income - to benefit from the tax credit, according to the study.
About a fifth of public school students' parents fall into that
range, according to the study. The vast majority - more than
three-fifths - make less than
that. |