Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
Weather
Complete Forecast
Search  Recent News  Archives  Web   for    




   • Front page
   • Metro
   • Sports

Tuesday, Oct 04, 2005
  email this    print this    reprint or license this   
Posted on Sun, Oct. 02, 2005

Critics upset South Carolina judge considered to replace O'Connor


Associated Press

A South Carolina woman and civil rights group have criticized federal judge Karen Williams, who some think is being considered for the U.S. Supreme Court.

Williams of Orangeburg, S.C., is considered to be a leading contender to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Legal experts in touch with administration officials about the selection process say the president is most likely to choose a woman to replace O'Connor, even though many of the often-mentioned candidates are men.

Lisa Ocheltree of Lexington, S.C., said Williams, who has served on the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals for 13 years, showed no sympathy for her sexual harassment lawsuit against a former employer.

"When I heard she could be nominated, I was outraged," said Ocheltree, who sued after she claimed the company fired her for complaining about crude sexual remarks. "It would be a kick in the butt for a lot of women."

In 1999, Williams was part of a three-judge panel of the 4th Circuit that overturned a jury's decision in Ocheltree's favor. The law doesn't protect women from "everyday insults as if they remained models of Victorian reticence," Williams wrote at the time.

Williams was reversed 10-2 when the full court considered Ocheltree's case.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People also has concerns with some of Williams' decisions, said Hilary Shelton, director of the group's Washington office.

"There are troubling issues not only regarding discrimination based on gender, but there appears to be an insensitivity toward plaintiffs in racial (employment) discrimination cases," she said.

Williams, a former trial lawyer, is known as one of the most conservative judges on the nation's most conservative federal appeals court. Law professors point to an opinion Williams wrote in 1999 that could have paved the way for overturning the 1966 Miranda case, which outlines the rights - "You have the right to remain silent ..." - that suspects must be read before a police interrogation. The Supreme Court voted 7-2 that Miranda would stand.

But Williams has had bipartisan support in South Carolina, including a recommendation from U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, the former chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus.

"I would certainly do whatever I can to make that happen," said Clyburn, whose district includes Williams' hometown. "She would do our state proud and herself proud."

Clyburn said he is good friends with her husband, attorney Charles H. Williams III.

"I think very well of her," Clyburn said.

Williams' father-in-law was the late state Sen. Marshall Williams, D-Orangeburg. Charles Williams has given generously to many Democratic candidates, including $2,000 to state Superintendent of Education Inez Tenenbaum during her U.S. Senate bid last year.


Information from: The State, http://www.thestate.com/

  email this    print this    reprint or license this