COLUMBIA, S.C. --
A week after his inauguration, Gov. Mark Sanford's agenda and
actions provoked criticism from a handful of legislators who
could be key to getting his proposals through the Legislature.
Lawmakers have been looking for Sanford to tell them how
he'd like the state's budget problems handled.
In Wednesday's State of the State address peppered with 20
"I would say" or "I'd say" phrases, Sanford offered no
concrete ways the state could deal with the current year's
budget problems and little guidance on the $1 billion crisis
overhanging next year's $5 billion spending plan.
The clearest cost-cutting proposal in his speech involved
getting rid of agency lobbyists who cost the state $1.9
million a year. He also said legislators should lower the
state's blood-alcohol standard in drunken driving cases to
0.08 percent from 0.10 percent, sparing the state the
threatened loss of $60 million in federal highway funds.
Closer to his new
home, Sanford told lawmakers he saved money already in his
budget by eliminating the $80,000-a-year director's position
at the Governor's Mansion.
"If every agency across South Carolina did that, just
looked for one function they thought they could do without, we
can go a long way toward closing the budget divide that is in
fact before us," Sanford said in his speech.
Instead of offering hope to some lawmakers that he would
allow an increase in the state's cigarette tax, Sanford tied
any increase to fundamental changes in the state's Medicaid
programs and a corresponding tax decrease, possibly the income
tax.
"It's a courageous stand to say, 'We're not going to raise
taxes,"' said House Majority Leader Rick Quinn, R-Columbia.
Sanford and Quinn, along with 65 legislators, signed
no-tax-increase pledges from Americans for Tax Reform.
Sanford mentioned "money" or "dollars" 16 times in his
address, which was heavy on restructuring government and
consolidating power in the governor's office. But he offered
no insight into what taxpayers could save or gain - other than
accountability - if the Legislature gave his office more
authority.
Sanford said before the speech that it would lack details
of financial benefits of restructuring. Instead, he said, it
would be a speech about "how do you deal with trying to
advance change in this kind of budget year."
"It's a good government, management type of approach," said
Francis Marion University political science professor Neal
Thigpen.
That approach extended to eliminating most statewide
elected offices and consolidating their operations under the
governor.
"Where he's going to run into trouble is he isn't going to
be able to do away with those elected positions," Thigpen
said. "I don't give him much hope in that at all." Sanford may
have better luck in consolidating some agencies and functions,
he said.
Calling the budget a "giant dragon," Sanford offered only a
few ways to slay it. It's unlikely those proposals would
influence the 2004 budget, which takes effect July 1.
He told legislators that:
- Governors should be required to submit a balanced budget.
Last year, Hodges' budget was roundly criticized for being
unbalanced because it relied on tapping $212 million in
reserve funds that were largely inaccessible while trusting
the state Budget and Control Board to find $150 million in
cuts.
- Changes are needed at the Board of Economic Advisors,
which forecasts state revenue, saying "the system is gamed"
and influenced by politics. The Republican governor will
appoint the board's chairman, and Sanford's nominee to head
the Revenue Department, Burnet Maybank, will have a nonvoting
voice on that board. The two other voting members are
appointed by House and Senate finance leaders, both
Republicans.
- Further state government growth caps, tied to inflation
and population growth, are needed. That move could prevent
rapid increases in state spending as the economy recovers and
the state's coffers swell.
- He wants structural reforms in the state's budgeting
process, including two-year budgets, a six-year financial plan
and 10-year capital spending priorities.
- Budget writers should not be allowed to use surpluses
that can't be counted on from year to year to pay for ongoing
programs.
- Creating a commission that will review state spending
beginning after Memorial Day - about the time the Legislature
is adjourning.
"It was really a management chitchat," Thigpen said.