Pushing for change,
making some progress
By MARK
SANFORD Guest
columnist
As the legislative session wrapped up, I was asked by several
reporters, “Where do things stand now?” My reply was that we
obviously had both wins and losses, but in either case I hope I was
judged on how consistently I pushed for change in the way some
things are done in Columbia — and how consistently I stood up for
the taxpayer.
I think we’ve done both, and I consider this start in changing
the mentality in Columbia our biggest success. In life, attitude has
to change before you can change results.
As for more concrete activities over the past 18 months, we’ve
focused on three broad fronts: the budget, legislation and
day-to-day governance. Here is an update:
• The budget. The front-row seat
in any legislative process lies in how much you spend and where you
spend it. In our state, the governor’s office has not historically
had much of a say in answering either question. That’s been the
Legislature’s sandbox. For more than 200 years, governors didn’t
even produce executive budgets, until Carroll Campbell began the
process a little more than 10 years ago.
Yet the governor’s office brings with it a unique statewide
perspective that Gov. Campbell believed was critical to the budget
process. It is precisely for this reason that we need the executive
branch to nudge and challenge the General Assembly into going just a
bit further in examining the trade-offs inherent in the budget
process.
We got involved in a way that has never happened before in our
state, and as a result of our budget, $125 million in direct savings
was incorporated into the final budget. The coming sale of the Bull
Street facility, Port Royal and 6,000 surplus state cars are
examples of changes that were in many cases long overdue.
• Legislation. We fell short of
where we’d like to be on this front, and my two biggest
disappointments were not seeing passage of our income tax relief
proposal and government restructuring. We ended up three votes short
of breaking a filibuster in the Senate that would have allowed a
vote on income tax relief. Had it happened, we had the votes to
win.
Restructuring was our second major disappointment, and here it’s
interesting to note that the Department of Motor Vehicles — the
agency that some argue is the new poster child for efficient and
accountable government since we passed DMV reform — requested 17
percent less money in next year’s budget than in this year’s. Change
to the structure of our government can make for a remarkable
difference in not only what government costs us, but how well it
serves us.
Probably our most significant legislative accomplishment came
with the Fiscal Discipline Act, which we worked on together with
House and Senate leadership. This means not only that our state’s
unconstitutional $155 million deficit will be paid off next fiscal
year, but also that the rate of government growth will be capped
next year to 3 percent. Deciding how big the table is before we try
to set it is just as important at home as this is to rational
budgeting — and this has the added benefit of protecting our state’s
Triple-A credit rating.
In the legislative arena, I’d give particular credit to Speaker
David Wilkins and other friends in the House for passing almost 90
percent of our Legislative agenda. I’d also thank such Senate allies
as Sens. Greg Ryberg, John Courson, Greg Gregory and Glenn
McConnell. Unfortunately, the rules in the Senate make it nearly
dysfunctional, and it is my hope that many of those rules are
changed this fall. If that happens, I believe we will pass “trapped”
measures such as income tax relief next year.
• Governance. I think our Cabinet
has been thoughtful in administering its various pieces of state
government. Judge Bill Byars’ presence at the Department of Juvenile
Justice had a lot to do with ending a court-run system that’s been
in place for more than a decade. Bob Faith has worked strenuously
not only at economic development, but also at ending a culture at
the Department of Commerce that wasn’t particularly accountable to
the taxpayers. SLED Chief Robert Stewart and Natural Resources
Director John Frampton have saved about $1 million by consolidating
our law enforcement air fleet.
The list goes on, but we have asked all agency heads to try to
serve people while running their part of government more like a
business. As an administration, we have tried to lead by example —
reducing hotel and mileage expenses by 84 percent, leaving 60
positions in our office unfilled, reducing the operating budget at
the Governor’s Mansion by 50 percent and simply being available to
folks in things like “Open Door After 4” office meetings that give
people a chance to sit down in my office for a visit.
For more details of the year’s activities, try our Web site at http://www.scgovernor.com/. In
the meantime, we will keep pushing for change in Columbia and ask
you to join us.
Mr. Sanford is governor of South Carolina. |