Sanford proposes
cigarette tax hikePart of money from
30-cents-a-pack increase would fund income tax
cutBy JOHN
O’CONNORjohnoconnor@thestate.com
A 30-cents-per-pack tax increase on cigarettes would partially
fund a $205 million income tax cut in Gov. Mark Sanford’s budget
next year.
This is the second time Sanford has proposed increasing the
cigarette tax in order to reduce income taxes. The new version,
rolled out Wednesday, is about half the size of one he introduced in
2003, but some lawmakers criticized his plan to use the money for
tax cuts instead of health care or insurance.
Swapping a cigarette tax hike for an income tax cut, Sanford
said, would reduce the number of smokers and make the state more
business-friendly.
“It’s a modest step forward, but again an important one,” the
governor said.
At 7 cents a pack, South Carolina has the lowest cigarette tax in
the nation. North Carolina’s will increase to 35 cents in July,
while Georgia’s is 37 cents. The median U.S. tax is 80 cents.
Sanford’s plan would work like this:
• The cigarette tax would be
increased by 30 cents a pack, raising $107 million.
• $98 million from the general
fund would be added to pay for $205 million in income tax cuts.
• Sanford said he would work out
details of the income tax cut with lawmakers, but it could be
applied to reducing the corporate income tax rate, the individual
income tax rate or indexing tax brackets for inflation — or any
combination of those.
The Legislature has discussed the issue before, but the plans
died for a variety of reasons ranging from anti-tax sentiment to
differences over how the money would be spent.
“We’ve been stuck on dead center for a long time,” Sanford
said.
Last year, a coalition of Democrats, some Republicans and small
businesses introduced a bill that would raise the cigarette tax and
use the money to expand insurance for the poor and small businesses.
That plan failed, in part, because health care costs would increase
while declining smoking rates would mean declining revenue.
Lawmakers said Wednesday Sanford’s choice not to use cigarette
tax money to aid health care costs could be the plan’s downfall.
“We’ll take a look at it, but we’re reluctant to raise any
taxes,” said Senate Majority Leader Harvey Peeler, R-Cherokee. “The
money should go to health care.”
Democrats agreed, noting 20 percent of state residents have no
health insurance.
“A cigarette tax would go a long way to closing the insurance gap
that exists in our state,” said Sen. Brad Hutto, D-Orangeburg, “and
help small businesses provide coverage for their employees.”
Rep. Rex Rice, R-Pickens, has been the House’s chief cigarette
tax increase advocate.
Rice agreed the money should be used for health care but would
support the governor’s plan if it raises the cost of cigarettes. The
bigger concern, he said, was to discourage smoking.
Rice thought the House was getting close to approving the
increase. Between bills and amendments last year, the House voted on
cigarette tax hikes — in various forms — at least six times.
At some point, Rice said, a majority of members voted yes on one
proposal or another.
“You had enough votes to pass it if you could have gotten them
all together at one time,” he said.
Reach O’Connor at (803)
771-8358. |