BENNETTSVILLE -- When Dianne West drives past two
state-of-the-art prisons on S.C. 9, it makes her angry.
"They are filled with people who are a product of what we see
around us," the first-grade teacher said of area poverty. "We're
willing to spend money to build prisons, but not schools. We need to
do more prevention."
She hopes the new statewide 1-cent sales tax that replaces
residential property taxes to operate schools will bring some
relief.
More than 85 percent of the students at Wallace Elementary/Middle
School where she teaches are on free or reduced-price lunch. The
community's tax base is low, and so are salaries. The school lost
about 25 percent of its teachers last school year, West said.
David Sherbine, Marlboro County schools superintendent, said the
penny sales tax approved during the legislature last spring will
bring some relief in the short term. It guarantees that counties in
poverty will receive up to $2.5 million each in sales tax revenues
to replace residential property taxes. Marlboro received $690,000 of
last year's budget from residential property taxes, so the sales tax
will add about $1.3 million to the school district's operating
revenue.
Counties in poverty with more than one school district will have
to share the $2.5 million and might not fare as well, Sherbine
points out.
Increased proceeds from the sales tax in future years will be
based on inflation and population growth. Marlboro, Sherbine said,
has not had big population increases.
But state Sen. Wes Hayes, R-Rock Hill, points out that after the
first year, the amount each district receives will be weighted per
pupil.
"One of the factors considered in the weighting will be poverty,"
said Hayes, a senate finance committee member who also chairs a
Senate committee on the state Education Finance Act. "These rural
districts generally don't have great numbers in growth, but they
have other needs. When they build in the poverty factor, it should
balance it."
What about federal dollars?
Poverty and low test scores are correlated, according to experts.
Schools with more than 50 percent of their students on free and
reduced-price lunch receive federal Title I money for education.
Marlboro schools received $690,000 in Title I money last year,
but will get one-third of that this year because the pot is being
spread among more school districts. That meant the district had to
reduce some of its progress made last year on classroom size and
salary increases.
Because of its poverty ranking, Marlboro schools won an 80-20
matching federal grant recently for up-to-date equipment to analyze
academic progress, match classroom materials to student progress and
to enhance classroom learning.
The problem is that, even when the schools acquire federal
poverty funds for needed technology, some do not have electrical
capacity to accommodate them. Voters did not pass last spring's bond
referendum to replace dilapidated schools built during the 1950s.
State Rep. Herb Kirsh, D-Clover, said he thinks the new state
penny sales tax will help schools in poverty. Kirsh, who sits on the
House budget committee, said districts in poverty were considered
when the bill was formulated.
"I think it will work," he said. "If not, anything we've done, it
can always be changed."
As for West, statistical projections indicate half of her kids
will not graduate high school, but she's not giving up. She's
turning down offers in nearby Laurinburg, N.C., where salaries are
higher, and there's a considerable signing bonus and more perks.
"I've stayed here because my heart's here," she said. "Money's
not everything."