EDITORIALS
Don't Punish
Speech Clemson inquiry should have
goal of diversity
Clemson University and leaders of the state chapter of the
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People are
rightly looking into an incident of race stereotyping at an
off-campus party.
White students, at least one in blackface, mimicked images of
hip-hop culture, according to a Clemson official. This took place on
the day before the national holiday last month honoring Martin
Luther King Jr.
Some of the students at the party, The Associated Press reported,
apologized at a meeting of students on the campus. As well it
should, the university is conducting an investigation of the party
and behavior of students, including underage drinking.
The NAACP leaders urged a thorough investigation and "timely and
appropriate action" by the university. They also said: "We will rely
on the findings from our own independent investigation to determine
how best to engage the students, administrators and faculty, and
local community leaders about broader diversity changes that can
enhance the educational experience for students at the
university."
From that, the NAACP investigation appears to be aimed at
helping students understand why black people would find minstrelsy
offensive - and helping them move beyond it.
To punish the students for offensive but constitutionally
permitted speech would be a mistake, and that shouldn't be the
NAACPs objective.
However, if its investigation results prompt Clemson to do more
to help students understand and accept diversity, that could be a
good outcome.
As is most often the case, more speech is the antidote to
offensive speech such as the Clemson students engaged in. |