COLUMBIA - Most black legislators say
they cannot get their proposals passed or considered in the General
Assembly because of an age-old problem - racism. They say if they
want to get a bill through the General Assembly, they normally have
to take it to a friendly white Republican lawmaker and ask him or
her to introduce it.
"Black legislators still are searching for equal footing in the
General Assembly," said state Rep. Seth Whipper, a black lawmaker
from Charleston. "There are problems with complete acceptance by
white legislators. Some people seem not to vote for legislation
blacks are involved with."
Several Republicans said race isn't the reason bills by black
lawmakers are rejected: Proposals are considered on their merits and
dismissed because of differing philosophies.
The problem became public this month when state Rep. Leon Howard,
a black Columbia Democrat, and state Rep. John Graham Altman, a
white Charleston Republican, almost came to blows after Altman
employed a rarely used procedural maneuver to quash a bill Howard
introduced. The proposal would have mandated paper coverings on all
drinking straws.
An analysis by The (Columbia) State newspaper shows black
lawmakers, all Democrats, don't have much success getting
legislation passed. But neither do white Democrats.
Most of the 19 black lawmakers interviewed said political
partisanship is as much, if not more, of a factor than racism in
what gets passed and what doesn't. Several black lawmakers declined
to talk on the record, saying the topic was too sensitive.
Republicans control the state House and Senate and the flow of
legislation. They set the agenda and the calendar.
"Most of it is partisan," said state Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, a
black legislator from Orangeburg and former House Democratic leader.
"But race is also a factor. Race permeates everything we do
here."
When Democrats controlled both chambers in 1993-94, blacks also
lagged in getting legislation approved, trailing even Republicans,
all of whom are white. In those years, the General Assembly approved
8.9 percent of the bills proposed by black legislators and 16
percent of those proposed by Republicans.
House Speaker David Wilkins, R-Greenville, took issue with black
representatives who say their legislation is doomed. "I see no
indication of that whatsoever," said Wilkins, who is white. "Bills
are defeated because of philosophies."
Clemson University political science professor Bruce Ransom, who
is black, agreed.
The problem black legislators have, Ransom said, is that much of
their legislation "tends to be progressive - some might say more
liberal - and not in keeping with the mainstream of South
Carolina."
House Majority Leader Rick Quinn, a white Columbia Republican,
said, "Ideas rise and fall on their merits. People aren't going to
vote against good ideas offered by black members."
One issue, creation of the state lottery, is an example of two
very different perspectives in the legislature. Quinn cites it as an
example of a bill initiated successfully by a black lawmaker, state
Rep. John Scott, a Columbia Democrat.
Many black lawmakers, however, point to the lottery as an example
of how a black lawmaker wasn't given credit for a major piece of
legislation. Scott had been pitching a lottery bill for several
years. The measure that finally became law looked very much like
Scott's bill, but it did not have his name on it, black lawmakers
said. It was credited as a committee bill.
Several black members were quick to praise Wilkins, saying his
actions are not racially motivated.
For instance, they credit Wilkins with naming two black Democrats
- Scott and state Rep. Joe Neal of Columbia - to key conference
committees on the lottery in 1999 and predatory lending this
year.
Wilkins also has appointed two black committee chairmen - Joe
Brown of Columbia to Medical, Military, Public and Municipal
Affairs; and Mack Hines of Florence to Interstate Cooperation.
But this inclusiveness must encompass the entire House
leadership, including Republican committee chairmen, black lawmakers
say.