Physician groups
slow reform bill, critics say Public
would hear patient complaints By
Clif LeBlanc Knight
Ridder
COLUMBIA - Physician organizations are
interfering with efforts to better clean up the medical profession
of rogue doctors, critics in the legislature said Thursday.
"It would seem to me that by their actions they are not taking
steps to move it along," said Sen. Brad Hutto, D-Orangeburg.
Hutto is one of the authors of an amendment that would allow the
public to learn of a complaint once the S.C. Medical Board's
investigative panel files formal charges against a doctor. Only the
board or its designee may sanction doctors.
Currently, the public is notified only after the board takes
final or emergency public action.
The rest of the disciplinary process, by law, is shrouded in
secrecy.
The long delay in the board's consideration of sanctions against
West Columbia alternative-medicine physician James Shortt is driving
many legislators to call for reforms faster.
Shortt is under federal investigation for suspicion that he
illegally prescribed performance-enhancing drugs to members of the
NFL's Carolina Panthers and local bodybuilders.
In addition, the board and state police are investigating the
death of a Shortt patient who got intravenous hydrogen peroxide as a
treatment for multiple sclerosis.
Shortt has not been charged with any crime, and the board
continues to list him as a physician in good standing.
A senator who Wednesday held up the amendment said he did it
because he wants time to study the proposal, not because he is a
front for physician groups.
"I'm not carrying their water," Sen. Ray Cleary, R-Murrells
Inlet, said of the physicians groups. "I just want to clean it up so
that we do the right thing."
Under Senate rules, an objection from a single senator can
postpone a vote on a bill.
Cleary, a dentist, acknowledged that doctors groups asked him to
review the amendment.
Efforts to reach the S.C. Medical Association, a doctors
organization that has objected to some efforts to discipline
physicians, were unsuccessful.
Hutto's amendment is co-sponsored by Republican Sens. Jake Knotts
of West Columbia, Larry Martin of Pickens, Harvey Peeler of Gaffney
and Tom Alexander of Walhalla.
Hutto and Cleary say medical organizations have told them they
would prefer to deal with discipline matters in a larger bill that
seeks to update the entire law that governs physician licensing and
discipline.
But that bill, drafted by the state medical board, is further
behind in the legislative process and would be difficult to enact
this year, Hutto and others say.
Cleary said he would read Hutto's amendment over the weekend and
either seek to improve it or withdraw his objection.
Hutto said that if the larger bill in the House does not meet the
legislative deadline of getting to the Senate by May 1, he and his
supporters will move ahead on the narrower discipline bill.
"I definitely think reforms need to be made this year," Hutto
said. |