EDITORIALS
Focus on
Driving S.C. legislators should ban
mobile cell phone use
Who among readers has not had a near collision because a driver
was distracted while talking on a cell phone? Not very many, we bet.
Just as cell phone signal emissions can interfere with airliner
guidance, a cell phone conversation interfered with the driver's
guidance system - the brain. A distracted driver is a danger to
everyone else on the road.
Two S.C. legislators want to discourage motorists from phoning
while driving. But their ideas for dealing with the problem don't go
nearly far enough.
S.C. Sen. Larry Martin, R-Pickens, wants to empower the Highway
Patrol to stop any motorist who acts inappropriately behind the
wheel. He has asked the S.C. Public Safety Department for statistics
possibly linking cell phone use to traffic collisions. Martin points
out that phoning while driving is not the only activity that
distracts drivers.
True. We have seen drivers reading books, looking at maps or
directions, putting on makeup, shaving and even brushing their
teeth. But our nonscientific survey of driver distraction sources
shows that phone use is far and away the biggest problem.
Meanwhile, S.C. Rep. Lanny Littlejohn, R-Pacolet, will again
propose legislation making it illegal for drivers younger than 18 to
use cell phones. Such a proposal failed last session - for good
reason. How on Earth are law enforcement officers supposed to gauge
the age of the youthful blabbing drivers they spot on the road?
The General Assembly should ban drivers from using cell phones -
period. Drivers who feel the urge to talk to friends - or who need
to report an emergency - can pull off the road, increasing the
safety of the motorists around them. Four states and the District of
Columbia ban phone use while driving. It's time for South Carolina
to join them.
|