COLUMBIA, S.C. - A round of state agency
layoffs that started in July hurt women and blacks more than white
men, state Budget and Control Board figures show.
"That is awful," said state Sen. Maggie Glover, a black Democrat
from Florence. "We are causing major devastation to our families,"
including black single parents, she said.
From July 1 to Sept. 11, 122 women and seven men were laid off.
Blacks make up about a third of the work force but received half of
all pink slips. Both figures uphold a long-term trend of women and
minorities being more prone to lose state agency jobs than white
men, observers say.
"That's kind of warped and one-sided," said Zenda Leaks, a
40-year-old Department of Public Safety lobbyist who was told
recently that her job will be cut Oct. 1.
Leaks is worried about paying her mortgage and getting a check
next month. "I'm applying any and everywhere I can, hoping something
will pan out," she said.
According to figures compiled by the state, since financial
problems began hitting South Carolina agency payrolls in 2001, 439
women and 208 men have been laid off. The job loss has affected 388
whites and 253 blacks.
That means women accounted for 68 percent of the layoffs and
blacks accounted for 39 percent, slight increases from figures
reflected in a January report by the South Carolina Human Affairs
Commission.
"The numbers are high," said Human Affairs Commissioner Jesse
Washington.
The report said women accounted for 58 percent of the state
payrolls but 66 percent of jobs cut. Blacks represented 35 percent
of the work force but 37 percent of layoffs.
Chris Drummond, Gov. Mark Sanford's spokesman, had no comment on
the layoff figures. The state Human Resources Office is responsible
for overseeing the layoff plans, he said. Given the downsizing
needed to curb the state's budget problems, Sanford's "ultimate goal
is to continue to provide services," Drummond said.
Department of Social Services cuts account for most of the
disparity since the fiscal year began in July. Since then, DSS has
removed 94 women and two men from the payroll.
Because women account for 82 percent of the DSS payroll, more
women lose jobs when layoffs hit, said Robin Owens, the agency's
human resources director. "When you look at our work force, women
are the dominant employees we have."
Since Sept. 11, the agency has announced cuts of 82 other
full-time workers - 57 women and 25 men, Owens said.
"How much can you really save?" Glover asked. "Women are not paid
what their male counterparts are paid to start with. We are making
72 cents for every dollar our male counterparts make.
"If you're terminating a woman, that's not your greatest
savings."
Layoffs at other agencies affected more women than men, too.
Women accounted for all seven of the Forestry Commission's layoffs
since July.
Forestry Commission spokesman Ken Cabe said administrative
assistants lost jobs when the foresters the women worked with were
reassigned or demoted. Three were offered other jobs but
declined.
Several foresters and forestry and mechanical supervisors took
demotions; some people running multicounty programs took steep pay
cuts and moved into entry-level jobs, Cabe said. "All but one were
males," he said.
Sam Wilkins, whose state Office of Human Resources reviews layoff
plans and helps agencies avoid discrimination issues, said he's seen
no bias toward cutting lowest-paid jobs first. Some agencies target
administrative areas and others hit management ranks. "I would say
it's all over the board," he said.
Wilkins and Washington said there have been no noticeable
increases in grievances
filed.