By Ron Barnett STAFF WRITER rbarnett@greenvillenews.com
|
 What's
your view? Click
here to add your comment to this story.
| |
The Greenville County school district has filed suit against the
WH Group, acknowledging that the district mistakenly sold computer
equipment that contained confidential information and seeking an
order to compel its return.
The school district "did not know of the existence of this
confidential data in these locations," the suit says. The district
"inadvertently sold the computers, computer equipment or other
surplused items with this mislaid information."
The lawsuit, filed late Wednesday but not entered into the
Greenville County Clerk of Court's system until Thursday, names
Kenneth Holbert Jr. and Scott Mann, both of Easley, as defendants,
along with the company they and four other people operate called the
WH Group.
Holbert and Mann had spoken through attorneys to remain anonymous
while making claims to have accidentally acquired confidential
information on computers and hard drives they bought at school
district auctions, but the lawsuit makes their identity a matter of
public record.
Advertisement
|
 |
They have said, through lawyers, that they wanted the story made
public because the school district had failed to respond to their
repeated warnings.
Greenville attorney David Gantt, who is representing them in the
case, declined to comment Thursday.
The suit states that the school district has no record of having
ever sold the "logistical server" the men claim to have purchased,
and which they say contains the Social Security numbers of more than
59,000 Greenville County students.
The school district "believed the computers and other surplused
items to be free of data, specifically confidential data," the suit
says. "The existence of confidential data contained on the hard
drives or in/on other surplused items was a factual mistake of the
school district."
It says the mistake was also the responsibility of the WH Group
and that this "mutual mistake" renders the agreement for purchase of
the equipment null and void.
The suit goes on to claim that the "school district's mistake has
been induced by the fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, concealment,
and/or imposition of defendants, without negligence on the part of
school district."
It claims that the WH Group contacted a school board member in
October 2004 with the information that they were in possession of
confidential student data and that "the purpose of the contact ...
was to solicit business from the school district in the form of
software purchasing."
The lawsuit says the board member set up a meeting between the WH
Group and Deputy Superintendent Lonnie Luce, who asked that they
return any confidential information. They "refused to return the
hardware," the suit says, but "assured the school district that any
confidential information would be destroyed."
Holbert and Mann have said through their attorney that they made
no such agreement.
The case file also includes an affidavit in which Luce states
that the school district "is the owner of confidential data ...
contained on hard drives in computers, servers, computer equipment,
or other property sold at a district auction of surplus property."
Luce says the value of the equipment is not more than $2,000.
State Sen. David Thomas, an attorney who has been holding a
computer for the WH Group, said he had been trying to work out an
agreement with the school district's attorneys to turn over the
equipment so long as an independent computer expert could be present
to document what's on the computer.
In the meantime, he sent an op-ed piece to The Greenville News
that stresses his concern that the school district's pursuit of
equipment owned by the WH Group is missing the bigger picture.
"It is critical to understand that these men only bought a small
fraction of the computers which were sold by the Greenville County
school system at these auctions," he wrote.
He repeated his call for the district to take action to protect
students in the event that they become victims of identity theft.
"This matter should be handled directly and promptly by the
school district and it should disengage from a policy that involves
stonewalling, pretending like someone else is at fault and hiring
high-price lawyers to cover up their mistake," he wrote. |