Customer Service: Subscribe Now | Manage your account | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Help
 GreenvilleOnline.com ? Weather ? Calendar ? Jobs ? Cars ? Homes ? Apartments ? Classifieds ? Shopping ? Dating
 
  • Search the Upstate:
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Greenville News
305 S. Main St.
PO Box 1688
Greenville, SC 29602

(864) 298-4100
(800) 800-5116

Subscription services
(800) 736-7136

Newspaper in Educ.
Community Involvement
Our history
Ethics principles

Send:
A story idea
A press release
A letter to the editor

Find:
A news story
An editor or reporter
An obituary

Photo reprints:
Submit a request

RSS Feeds
Top Stories, Breaking News
Add to My Yahoo!
Local News
Add to My Yahoo!
Business
Add to My Yahoo!
Sports
Add to My Yahoo!
Opinion
Add to My Yahoo!
Entertainment
Add to My Yahoo!

Get news on your smartphone!
Get the latest headlines and stories from The Greenville News on your smartphone or PDA.

[ Point here ] [ Learn more ]

Advertisement
Friday, December 8    |    Upstate South Carolina News, Sports and Information

District sues to get school data back
Computers were sold with no knowledge of records, suit says

Published: Friday, December 8, 2006 - 6:00 am


By Ron Barnett
STAFF WRITER
rbarnett@greenvillenews.com


What's your view? Click here to add your comment to this story.

The Greenville County school district has filed suit against the WH Group, acknowledging that the district mistakenly sold computer equipment that contained confidential information and seeking an order to compel its return.

The school district "did not know of the existence of this confidential data in these locations," the suit says. The district "inadvertently sold the computers, computer equipment or other surplused items with this mislaid information."

The lawsuit, filed late Wednesday but not entered into the Greenville County Clerk of Court's system until Thursday, names Kenneth Holbert Jr. and Scott Mann, both of Easley, as defendants, along with the company they and four other people operate called the WH Group.

Holbert and Mann had spoken through attorneys to remain anonymous while making claims to have accidentally acquired confidential information on computers and hard drives they bought at school district auctions, but the lawsuit makes their identity a matter of public record.

Advertisement

They have said, through lawyers, that they wanted the story made public because the school district had failed to respond to their repeated warnings.

Greenville attorney David Gantt, who is representing them in the case, declined to comment Thursday.

The suit states that the school district has no record of having ever sold the "logistical server" the men claim to have purchased, and which they say contains the Social Security numbers of more than 59,000 Greenville County students.

The school district "believed the computers and other surplused items to be free of data, specifically confidential data," the suit says. "The existence of confidential data contained on the hard drives or in/on other surplused items was a factual mistake of the school district."

It says the mistake was also the responsibility of the WH Group and that this "mutual mistake" renders the agreement for purchase of the equipment null and void.

The suit goes on to claim that the "school district's mistake has been induced by the fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, concealment, and/or imposition of defendants, without negligence on the part of school district."

It claims that the WH Group contacted a school board member in October 2004 with the information that they were in possession of confidential student data and that "the purpose of the contact ... was to solicit business from the school district in the form of software purchasing."

The lawsuit says the board member set up a meeting between the WH Group and Deputy Superintendent Lonnie Luce, who asked that they return any confidential information. They "refused to return the hardware," the suit says, but "assured the school district that any confidential information would be destroyed."

Holbert and Mann have said through their attorney that they made no such agreement.

The case file also includes an affidavit in which Luce states that the school district "is the owner of confidential data ... contained on hard drives in computers, servers, computer equipment, or other property sold at a district auction of surplus property."

Luce says the value of the equipment is not more than $2,000.

State Sen. David Thomas, an attorney who has been holding a computer for the WH Group, said he had been trying to work out an agreement with the school district's attorneys to turn over the equipment so long as an independent computer expert could be present to document what's on the computer.

In the meantime, he sent an op-ed piece to The Greenville News that stresses his concern that the school district's pursuit of equipment owned by the WH Group is missing the bigger picture.

"It is critical to understand that these men only bought a small fraction of the computers which were sold by the Greenville County school system at these auctions," he wrote.

He repeated his call for the district to take action to protect students in the event that they become victims of identity theft.

"This matter should be handled directly and promptly by the school district and it should disengage from a policy that involves stonewalling, pretending like someone else is at fault and hiring high-price lawyers to cover up their mistake," he wrote.


Article tools

 E-mail this story
 Print this story
 Get breaking news, briefings e-mailed to you

Related
Copy of Greenville County School District lawsuit
Related coverage
Computer's return to district rests on deal (12/07/06)
Video: Attorney discusses school data leak (12/06/06)

Related news from the Web


Sponsored links

 

StoryChat Post a CommentPost a Comment   View all CommentsView All Comments

citizen60 Once again we are forced to pay people who prove incompetent. Why didn't the school district just offer to pay the WH group for the stuff they bought?

As for SLED clearing those in the district, I have not read or heard of such at this time. I do have questions about WH's motives with regard to selling their software, being turned down and now this.

Regardless of WH group and their intent, the school district is responsible for safeguarding our information. Here you have a group of adults who are supposed to be proper examples to our children as they have control over them and us and they are, instead, showing our children the sad example that if you think you are important enough you don't ever have to take responsibility for anything.

Nice example!

citizen60 Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:34 am

newcastlesmith penelope541
Anybody that would sell a computer with hard drive still intact is an idiot.
No matter how many times you format or "erase" a hard drive, the info that was on it can still be accessed (layers and layers). I don't want people who have absolutely no common sense to be in charge of kids education. We as a community deserve and should demand better.

newcastlesmith Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:02 am

penelope541 Newcastle, SLED has already cleared the school district. It has now been revealed the Group somehow obtained the material through a server and not a hard drive. How did they get access to the server? Did they somehow hack into it? Even Thomas admitted they went through "layers and layers" to get to the info. I wonder if they hacked into the School District somehow and "saved" to a hard drive. Don't know. But this is a smelly situation.

I applaud the Board and Ms. Fisher for their attention.

Seems to me some are using this as just another excuse to bash public education.

Take your coals somewhere else, Newcastle. Why not Easley?

penelope541 Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:23 am

newcastlesmith The school district should not be blaming the WH group for there incompetence. All members of the board and all administrators need to resign immediately. SLED should be brought in, and the state needs to take control until competent replacements can be hired. The WH group should be applauded for exposing the stupidity and ignorance of the school district. With any luck we will see many charges and many arrests of school district officials in the coming weeks. The guilty must pay.

newcastlesmith Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:15 am

shawnb The school district can sue to get the computer(s) back, but you can't just "get data back". Data is easily copied and distributed -- the entire hard drive in that computer could be copied to 4 DVDs and secretly kept forever for less than $1. And it could be shared worldwide via the internet in a matter of minutes. And even if the school district gets the computer back, they will never be able to tell if this has actually happened.

I hate to say it, but I agree with Thomas -- the school district is missing the point here. Getting this one computer back solves nothing. There are bigger and more important issues here.

shawnb Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:50 am

Post a CommentPost a Comment   View all CommentsView All Comments

Advertisement


GannettGANNETT FOUNDATION

Copyright 2005 The Greenville News.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, updated June 7, 2005.

USA WEEKEND USA TODAY