Gov. Mark Sanford's "Contract for Change" as he heads toward his third session with the S.C. legislature could wind up being a pawn in the Senate's annual "stubbornness" fest.

He'll have a fight on his hands on at least two topics: education and changes to the way the Senate does business.

His other priorities -- income tax relief, tort reform and government restructuring -- may be easier than changing the Senate rules.

Restructuring would strengthen the captain of state, but it could result in a significant change in the line of authority and in considerable savings in the operation of government.

A voucher system to allow parents to send their children to a school of their choice will result in much debate, as will income tax relief and tort reform.

But reforming Senate rules may create a real wrestling match between the governor and senators.

S.C. lawmakers always have been an independent lot. Last year, they turned on the state's Republican torchbearer, denying a major element of his programs. But when it comes to power and their particular rules of engagement, they give no quarter to those who seek change.

While a handful of state senators talk each year until they are blue in the face, the remainder of the Senate and other South Carolinians should be red in the face -- angry at attempts to block important legislation and progress. This is a stubborn group.

Sanford will deserve accolades if he can effect change in this chamber.