From: Jon
Ozmint
Sent: Monday, March 13,
2006 9:20 AM
To: Daniel Murphy;
David Tatarsky; Gerri Miro; Glen Franz; Robert Ward; Russell Campbell; Barbara
Grissom; Benjamin Montgomery; Blake Taylor; Bob Wood; Carl Frederick; Daryl
Giddings; Debbie Barnwell; Dennis Patterson; Elizabeth Durham; Gary Boyd; Gayle
Brazell; George Roof; Jimmy Sligh; John Near; John Solomon; John Ward; Kathy
Thompson; Ron McLean; Tony Ellis; Wendell Blanton; David Dunlap; Elaine Pinson;
Elaine Robinson; Glenn Stone; Jannita Gaston; John McCall; Mildred Hudson;
Raymond Reed; Robert Mauney; Robert Stevenson; Sandra Barrett; Doug Taylor;
Edsel Taylor; George Hagan; Joel Anderson; Michael Sheedy; Oscar Faulkenberry;
Robert Bollinger; Tim Riley; Bernard Mckie; Catherine Kendall; Colie Rushton;
Judy Anderson; Richard Bazzle; Stan Burtt; Tony Padula; William White; Willie
Eagleton
Subject: Week of March
13, 2006
Good Morning,
One of the most frequent complaints
in any large organization is favoritism. While some of that criticism is
misplaced, leaders should deal with the perception of favoritism
whenever we get the opportunity. Also, we should deal ruthlessly with actual
favoritism when we confront it.
Most of the front line complaints I
hear about favoritism concern shift assignments, work assignments, and ‘those
who are constantly hanging out in certain locations.’ Check behind to make
sure that the perception is not based on reality.
Sam Walton’s Rule Number 7: Listen
to everyone. And figure out ways to get them talking. These are the folks who
really know what’s going on out in the front lines.
I think that we all could spend more
time listening. I know that I could. This week, I have been listening to honest
feedback from Wardens about electronic handheld games. When I ask for feedback,
I want it to be honest, even if it must be brutally honest. I am happy for the
input and glad that I listened.
We are currently battling the
Commission for the Blind over vending operations in level II and III prisons.
Several wardens, a major and divisional staff have been involved. Everyone has
been helpful. The issue is still up in the air.
We will probably be forced to bring
a few of you to testify against a bill that would require us to move ANY
inmate to family funerals!!!! Can you imagine moving many of our SMU and MSU
inmates, many of our perverts, death row inmates, etc. to funerals. While I
doubt that the bill will get any serious support, it is most disappointing that
anyone would introduce such a reckless piece of legislation. I guess I expect
too much.
The house budget process and the
three separate budget bills are almost indecipherable. In fact, it is too much
of a mess to attempt to explain. Most believe that the Senate will start from
scratch.
Have a great
week.