Sanford skeptical
of Senate committee budget plan
By JENNIFER
HOLLAND The Associated
Press
Gov. Mark Sanford said Friday he was skeptical of last-minute
money the Senate Finance Committee has found to give state workers
raises and avoid another round of agency spending cuts.
Sanford said politics were at play Thursday night to make the
senators appear to be the heroes in the long budget-writing process
after he was criticized for making tough choices to cut government
spending in a tight budget year.
“I think in politics, if it doesn’t smell right, doesn’t look
right, probably something isn’t right,” Sanford told The Associated
Press. “I can’t precisely say that, but I just think the numbers are
too close.”
Senate Finance Committee chairman Hugh Leatherman said he merely
took a report Thursday from the state’s economic forecasters and
projected the state would have enough surplus money at the end of
the fiscal year to cover a $110 million funding shortfall in the
budget.
“It’s not my goal for the Senate to look like heroes,” Leatherman
said. “It’s my goal to do a balanced budget, which we did.”
The extra cash was needed after the committee dumped or altered
several budget proposals pushed by Sanford and the House, creating a
$107.8 million gap in the state’s spending plan.
Hours after the Board of Economic Advisors said the state had
generated $99 million more than expectations, Leatherman estimated
the surplus would grow enough to close the gap.
“I don’t get that. The timing is just too weird for me,” the
governor said.
Leatherman said the governor could have used reports of excess
revenue in his executive budget in January.
Sanford said being too optimistic about the upward swing in the
economy threatens to put the state at risk of midyear budget
cuts.
“I think the verdict is still out, so you want to be very, very
conservative with regard to building expectations on what happens
next with the economy,” he said.
Sanford said the state’s economic forecasters are tied to a
process that “lends itself to politics.”
Another example, Sanford said, was the $90 million more House
budget writers had to spend than the governor after State Revenue
Department Director Burnet Maybank convinced lawmakers he could
generate that much money if budget writers gave him $9 million to
hire auditors and tax collectors.
“What we end up with is a game of chicken.”
The Senate gets the benefit of hindsight because it works off the
House’s version, which starts with the governor’s plan, said John
Rainey, chairman of Board of Economic Advisors. |