This is a printer friendly version of an article from
www.goupstate.com
To print this article open the file menu and choose
Print.
Back
Article published Apr 24, 2003
Sanford plan would mean more local control for
school spending
JENNIFER HOLLAND
Associated
Press
COLUMBIA -- Education leaders are encouraged by Gov. Mark
Sanford's proposal to give school districts more control in how to spend state
dollars, but they say it still doesn't address the problem of shrinking
budgets.
"Flexibility is good, but you cannot generate extra dollars by just
making an inadequate amount of money flexible," said Robert Scarborough,
executive director of the South Carolina Association of School
Administrators.
Sanford announced his plan to restructure education funding
Wednesday.
He has gathered nearly 60 sponsors for a House bill that would
consolidate dozens of spending sources into six categories.
Under the bill,
districts would be given money for:
• Quality teaching, which would cover
salaries, benefits, bonuses, teacher supply stipends.
• Instruction for
programs such as gifted and talented, reading, math and science, and early
childhood development.
• Technical assistance for low performing school
districts promised in the Education Accountability Act, such as teacher
specialists and homework centers.
• Operations, infrastructure and safety,
which would cover such costs as school bus driver salaries, school safety
officers, and school construction and maintenance.
• Work force education to
fund adult programs such as family literacy and career and technology education
equipment.
• Special needs to cover services for children with
disabilities.
Scarborough says districts like the idea to direct funds in the
way the local community wants, but it also "sets the stage for everyone to
expect their program to be funded."
Legislators are trying to figure out how
best to fund education in one of the tightest budget years in recent
memory.
Educators say they need about $2,200 a year per student from the
state, but House budget writers have allocated only $1,643 per pupil for next
school year.
The bill, called Streamlined Management and Accountable
Resources for Teaching, or SMART Funding, would not give schools more money, but
Sanford says it frees up existing funds so districts can cover expenses as they
wish.
"Reforming the way we fund education in South Carolina is key
regardless of the budget situation you find yourself in," Sanford said. "When
you look at the budget crisis we're currently facing, though, I believe it's
absolutely essential."
The districts could transfer 20 percent of the funds
between the six categories, according to the bill, and could carry forward all
unspent funds to be used in the next year.
The Department of Education also
would be expected to create an accounting network with the districts to follow
the money.
There are concerns of tracking how the money is spent, said Rep.
Bob Walker, R-Landrum, but "accountability is key to the whole
thing."
Districts and schools already are graded each year based on student
performance, he said.
It's frustrating for schools to be held accountable,
despite a lack of resources, said Scott Price, spokesman for the state School
Boards Association.
The bill "doesn't address the crisis that we're in," he
said.
Also, educators are concerned about block funding like this bill
because it could be another means to reduce funding, Price said.
"That's why
it's been eyed with suspicion," he said.
State Education Superintendent Inez
Tenenbaum wants to explore how to give districts more control over their
spending, said her spokesman Jim Foster.