P/SUNNY
73°

Tuesday  August 10, 2004

**Schoolyard bully stories requested**

Site Map Subscribe Contact Us

Front
News
Sports
Obituaries
Entertainment
State News
AP News
Lottery Results
Classifieds
Lifestyles
Panorama
Police Blotter
Movies
Opinion
Clarendon
Business
Outdoors
Public Record
A Look Back
Photo Gallery
The Messenger

Weather
T.V. Listings
Event Calendar
Staff Directory
Business Directory
Links

Retail
Classified

E-mail
Movie Trivia
Forums
Chat
Match.com

Network Support
Web Development
Web Hosting

August
S M T W T F S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4

Date Published: August 10, 2004   

Voting machines divide delegation

Republicans, Democrats take different views on whether to use new system

By LESLIE CANTU
Item Staff Writer
lesliec@theitem.com

Sumter County's legislative delegation voted 5-2 on Monday to stick to its original recommendation that the election commission continue using the punch-card voting system in this November's general election.

Reps. Marty Coates, R-Florence, and Murrell Smith, R-Sumter, changed their previous positions and dissented, primarily because of the $185,000 in federal incentive money the county will lose if it doesn't use electronic voting machines this year.

Reps. Grady Brown, D-Bishopville, Joe Neal, D-Hopkins, and David Weeks, D-Sumter, and state Sens. John Land, D-Manning, and Phil Leventis, D-Sumter, voted to recommend that the commission stick with the punch-card system this year, mostly because of the local election commission's concerns about its ability to conduct a fair and efficient election with the new machines on such short notice.

The legislative delegation has no authority over the election commission, but the delegation appoints members of the commission.

The election commission plans to meet Thursday and vote again on whether or not to use the electronic machines this November. The commission voted July 27 to reject the new machines based on the recommendation of the legislative delegation.

The legality of the vote has been questioned, however, because it was reportedly taken during a closed-door executive session, a violation of open meetings law. Thursday's meeting was called in the interest of public meetings, commission Chairman Goliath Brunson Jr. said.

Since then, Sumter County Council has stated its support for abandoning the punch-card system for electronic machines because of the federal incentive money.

Brunson; Carol Ann Rogers, the election commission vice chairwoman; Pat Jefferson, executive director of the election commission; and Louvenia J. Dinkins, a member of the commission, attended Monday's delegation meeting.

After the delegation's vote, Smith asked the commission to consider the effect losing $185,000 in incentive money will have on the taxpayers of Sumter County.

Leventis immediately asked the commission to consider only its ability to conduct an election, not any related money issues.

During the hourlong meeting at the Sumter County Courthouse, most members of the delegation seemed to stick to their opening statements. Only Land said he came to the meeting to get information.

Picture
LEVENTIS
Leventis passed out summaries of newspaper articles from Florida, North Carolina and Texas about failures of ES&S's machines in elections as recently as January. ES&S is the vendor South Carolina chose to supply machines for the state.

"I think the bottom line is the voters and only the voters, and not the Sumter County Council and not the Sumter County delegation," Leventis said. "I don't believe that we can guarantee the voters of this county an election that's verifiable."

Coates said there have been problems even with the old punch-card system, including during a 2000 election in Florence County.

Picture
SMITH
Smith told the commission he sympathizes with the position it has been placed in and doesn't approve of the way the State Election Commission has handled the change. But he said the issue of the money is what swayed him to change his mind.

"Come 2006, we have no choice," he said. "Come 2006, we're going to pass off $185,000 to the taxpayers of Sumter County."

Land suggested that the delegation contact members of the state's congressional delegation to see if they could put in place a retroactive waiver for Sumter County, since the State Election Commission didn't apply for a waiver.

After the meeting Sumter County Councilman Carol Burr said there's no way the congressional delegation would approve such a waiver. The counties that have agreed to make the change this year would "raise the devil" if the delegation made a special waiver for Sumter, he said.

Currently, 11 counties in South Carolina use the punch-card system that has been ordered phased out following the problems with punch cards in Florida that called into question the 2000 presidential election. The other 10 counties have agreed to switch to the electronic system in November.

After the vote, Weeks told commission members he believes they have the best perspective on the matter.

"If you have the concerns you've expressed today, then I have the same concerns," Weeks said.

The dozen people watching the meeting laughed when Brown closed by saying he didn't think that politics should play a part in the decision.

"I don't think this is funny," Brown said.

"Neither do we," a member of the audience shot back.

The State Election Commission has ordered enough machines to cover Sumter County if the county election commission decides to use the electronic voting machines after all. However, Jefferson noted that the state's training day is Aug. 24, the same day as a bond referendum for the county library in Sumter. She said the State Election Commission is looking at setting up another training time for Sumter County.

Contact Staff Writer Leslie Cantu at lesliec@theitem.com or 803-774-1250.

E-mail to a friend

Previous Page

Copyright © The Item.com.  All Rights Reserved.
Site design and layout by SCnetSolutions.