Groups push Put
Parents in Charge Act School-choice
supporters hope issue will be emphasized in Sanford’s State of the
State By AARON GOULD
SHEININ Staff
Writer
Supporters of Gov. Mark Sanford’s signature education issue have
a message for the governor: Please put Put Parents in Charge in the
State of the State.
As Sanford prepares for his third State of the State address
Wednesday, those supporters are eager for the Republican to lobby
hard in favor of the bill.
“I’d like to think it would be a major part of the State of the
State speech,” said Tom Swatzel of Murrells Inlet, president of the
conservative organization South Carolinians for Responsible
Government, which has made Put Parents in Charge one of its key
issues.
“There is a huge grass-roots effort to assist the governor in
passing the Put Parents in Charge Act. I would like to see it be
part of the speech.”
Swatzel’s organization, which enjoys the backing of several
national conservative policy groups, recently has launched a
television, radio and billboard advertising campaign to help
galvanize public support for the bill.
The legislation, which would give parents an income tax break to
send their children to a private school or another public school, is
one of the governor’s priorities for the year. The concept of school
choice also was one of the key planks of his 2002 campaign for
governor.
Yet the bill faces an uncertain future in the
Republican-controlled General Assembly.
House Republicans are fractured over the issue, and Senate
Education Committee chairman John Courson, R-Richland, calls support
for the bill in the Senate “tepid.”
Opponents generally follow one of two arguments:
• The bill would take needed money
and support away from public schools.
• It would take needed money away
from everything else.
House Speaker Pro Tem Doug Smith, R-Spartanburg, has sponsored
the bill in the House. He said that while Sanford has more actively
promoted his income tax cut and government restructuring plan, he
has not seen a softening of the governor’s interest in Put Parents
in Charge.
“It’s a little early to measure that,” Smith said. “I’ll measure
it personally by what he says in the State of the State.”
Sanford’s staff would not provide any insights into the
governor’s speech, which he will deliver at 7 p.m. Wednesday before
a joint session of the House and Senate.
Supporters, including the Illinois-based Legislative Education
Action Drive, are encouraged that Sanford mentioned Put Parents in
Charge in the $5.3 billion budget he proposed earlier this
month.
Asked whether Sanford needs to make the bill a major part of his
speech, LEAD director Bill Wilson demurred. “Oh, I don’t know. I
don’t try to read tea leaves like that.”
LEAD and South Carolinians for Responsible Government are
connected in more than just philosophy of government. Each is part
of a network of organizations that includes Americans for Limited
Government, Social Security Choice, and U.S. Term Limits.
But Wilson’s organization — dedicated to promoting plans such as
Put Parents in Charge — has made South Carolina the bellwether of
its efforts nationally.
With a Republican governor who has long supported some kind of
taxpayer-funded school choice plan, and a Republican-controlled
House and Senate, the group saw South Carolina as a great
opportunity for a statewide initiative.
Failure here could have national implications for the school
choice movement.
Still, Wilson said, there is a long way to go.
“This is going to be a full campaign all the way through, and
things will come and go and ebb and flow all the way through it,”
Wilson said.
Courson, the Senate Education Committee chairman, warns that time
is actually short.
“If he’s going to get one of these major items passed for him to
sign into law, he needs to do it this year,” Courson said. “Once we
adjourn in June, we automatically go into election cycle for 2006.
Next year, regrettably, there will probably be a lot of partisan
debate and underlying currents on any legislation.”
Reach Gould Sheinin at (803) 771-8658 or asheinin@thestate.com |