Nuclear waste tanks
in poor condition 15 of 51 containers
at Savannah River Site have problems, reports
show By SAMMY
FRETWELL Staff
Writer
More than one-fourth of the Savannah River Site’s high-level
atomic waste tanks have cracked, rusted or leaked since the 1950s
and 1960s, federal inspection reports show.
U.S. officials have been unable to agree with environmentalists
on how to stop future threats from the tanks. But neither side
disputes the potential hazard these tanks present to the environment
near Aiken.
Exposure to high-level waste can kill a person instantly. Some
radioactive waste can linger in the environment for hundreds of
thousands of years.
Recent federal inspection reports note hundreds of “leak sites,’’
or cracks, in 15 of the 51 aging steel tanks. In some cases, the
cracks date to the 1950s; in others, leak sites have been found only
in the past three years, according to the most recent tank
inspection report.
To date, secondary containment systems from most tanks have kept
radioactive poisons from reaching groundwater beneath the
300-square-mile federal weapons complex.
The government also does not know of any tanks that currently are
leaking, said Dean Campbell, a spokesman for Westinghouse Savannah
River Co., which runs SRS for the U.S. Department of Energy.
Still, a containment system failed in one case, when radioactive
waste leaked into the ground. And federal officials say the tanks’
condition is a concern. A number of tanks are within 8 to 10 feet of
the water table, according to Westinghouse.
“They obviously are getting older and will not last forever,”
said Charles Hansen, an assistant waste disposition manager with the
U.S. Department of Energy.
“This is highly radioactive, and there is a concern to get that
waste out as soon as possible. There’s always some potential for
inadvertent leakage into the environment.”
One of the most recent problems occurred in 2001, when 92 gallons
of radioactive waste leaked through a 40-year-old tank and into a
containment area, according to the government’s latest tank
inspection report.
After finding the waste, inspectors located six leak sites on the
750,000-gallon, 24-foot high steel tank. The leak was stopped before
it reached groundwater.
All told, the tanks at SRS contain about 37 million gallons of
liquids, salts and highly contaminated sludge. The containers are
more than 24 feet long and can hold 750,000 to 1.3 million gallons
of liquid high-level waste.
Waste pumped into them came from the creation of materials for
nuclear weapons during the Cold War. The tanks contain an assortment
of radioactive waste, including uranium, cesium and plutonium.
Today, many tanks are less than half full, but environmentalists
say the remaining radioactivity is among the highest at federal
nuclear weapons facilities. DOE officials say some of the tanks at
SRS have less radioactivity than others.
“These tanks are not designed for long-term storage, as you can
obviously tell,’’ said Geoff Fettus, a lawyer with the Natural
Resources Defense Council, which sued to stop the DOE’s cleanup plan
in favor of its own.
Most of the tank problems center on age and the way they were
constructed, according to the U.S. Department of Energy and its
chief contractor, Westinghouse.
The 1950s- and ’60s-era tanks were not treated to handle stress
as well as more recently installed tanks, the DOE and Westinghouse
say. Carbon steel used at the time also is not as sturdy as that
used later. Most of the tank cracks occur along weld seams, where
stress builds up from the waste inside.
In 1960, tens of gallons of high-level liquid waste trickled into
the ground at SRS after one tank cracked. The liquid flowed for
about six hours and escaped a secondary containment pan, Campbell
said.
Campbell said the tank had since been emptied of most of its
contents, although a layer of waste remained on the bottom.
Other problems found in the latest Westinghouse tank inspection
report include:
• More than a foot of dried waste
in a containment area outside a 1-million gallon tank installed in
1957. Inspections have found 33 leak sites, but federal officials
estimate the tank contains 50 cracks.
• Nearly one foot of dried waste
in a containment area outside of a 750,000 gallon tank installed in
1955. The leak may have occurred the same year the tank was
installed. DOE hasn’t determined the source of the leaked waste.
• Eighteen leak sites have been
found on one tank, including two discovered in 2000 and one
through-wall crack in 2002. Two cracks have been found near the
tank’s bottom.
• Five gallons of waste were
discovered leaking from a 45-year-old tank in 2001. Inspections
found 15 leak sites never before detected.
In an attempt to attack the problem, energy department officials
seek permission from Congress to empty most of the waste from the
tanks, then fill the containers with grout to neutralize atomic
refuse the agency says it cannot remove.
Agency officials say that will speed the tank cleanup before a
serious accident occurs. Officials say the concrete-like grout will
make the gooey waste less likely to move in groundwater. Of the 51
tanks at SRS, two have been formally closed in the manner the DOE
proposes for the remainder of the tanks.
Critics of the DOE plan, including former President Jimmy Carter,
say the tanks’ poor condition shows the need to empty the containers
completely. They do not think concrete will neutralize the remaining
waste in the tanks.
Waste removed from the tanks likely would wind up at the Yucca
Mountain national disposal site in Nevada, if it opens.
So far, Congress has supported the DOE’s plan, but the issue
likely will not be resolved for at least another month.
Reach Fretwell at (803) 771-8537 or sfretwell@thestate.com. |