CHARLESTON - Gov. Mark Sanford said Friday
he wants more coordination of higher education in South Carolina and
proposed that if colleges are uncomfortable with that, they can go
private.
Sanford, speaking with reporters about his executive budget at
The Citadel, said South Carolina duplicates programs in higher
education that a state of 4 million people can't afford.
There are 33 public institutions of higher learning in the
state.
The state averages 105 percent of the national average for
tuition while North Carolina is at 82 percent and Georgia at 86
percent, the governor said.
Sanford said he will push for better coordination of how the
state spends scarce education dollars, whether it is strengthening
the existing Commission on Higher Education, creating a board of
regents or some similar body.
"If any institution ultimately feels uncomfortable with our push
toward coordination, they can exit the system. We think this is more
than fair," said Sanford, who unveiled a list of 13 of the state's
larger colleges and universities that would be eligible.
Under the Sanford proposal, such institutions would not receive
state money and would be free of state regulation.
They would be allowed to keep their buildings and land, but would
have to reorganize as not-for-profits and charge a reduced tuition
rate, as state schools now do, for S.C. students. The tax money
saved, Sanford said, could go to other institutions.
Any such change would have to be approved by state lawmakers.
Sanford noted less than 20 percent of the funding for Clemson
University is state money while just under 16 percent of The
Citadel's budget comes from state appropriations.
"Clemson is a public university in terms of its character,
personality and values, not just in terms of its funding," said
Clemson President Jim Barker, who added Clemson's success can be
attributed to its sense of obligation to the state.
Barker said Clemson officials have watched the debate about
privatizing state universities in other states.
"Until we have done considerably more research, we cannot know if
privatization would be the best way to serve the state, our
students, alumni and other constituents," he added.
"This complex proposal will require comprehensive study and
analysis by the university's administration and board of trustees,"
said Andrew Sorensen, president of the University of South
Carolina.
Sorensen said he felt the university "will never abandon its
fundamental commitment to providing the highest possible educational
opportunity to the largest possible number of qualified South
Carolinians."
Citadel spokeswoman Charlene Gunnells said the school was
studying the Sanford proposal and had no immediate comment.
Sanford was asked whether the plan wouldn't mean taxpayers would
lose an investment they have made over the years in the colleges and
universities that decide to go private.
"I don't think that they would lose the investment," Sanford
said. "Clemson is not going anywhere. The physical plant that is in
the Upstate will long remain in the Upstate ... and I'm not
suggesting they would or would not want to do it."
Sanford said the idea is that if the state pushes too hard for a
coordinated system of higher education, "there is a safety valve"
for institutions that have a different vision of their roles.
Schools on the list include Clemson, South Carolina, the Medical
University of South Carolina, South Carolina State, the College of
Charleston, The Citadel, Winthrop, Francis Marion, Coastal Carolina,
Lander, USC-Aiken, USC-Spartanburg and USC-Beaufort.