Gov. Mark Sanford has spent two months trying to broker a
compromise to the tussle between USC and downtown hoteliers over the
university’s proposed 117-room Inn at USC.
Sanford’s involvement was driven by his concern over the prospect
of a state-supported university competing head to head against
private businesses, according to his spokesman, Will Folks.
As a congressman, Sanford was the sole sponsor of a 1999 bill
designed to block the government from issuing bonds to build
hotels.
Both sides of the hotel debate publicly have embraced Sanford’s
involvement. But hoteliers were thrilled when the governor entered
the arena.
“I thought it was an extraordinary gesture on his part,” said
hotel developer Bo Aughtry, who owns the Hampton Inn on Gervais
Street.
Sanford was expected to come out against USC’s planned hotel at
an August news conference but canceled the event at the urging of
USC officials.
Instead, Sanford and chief of staff Fred Carter, on sabbatical
from Francis Marion University, have hosted about a half-dozen
meetings between USC and hotel officials.
Aughtry, who attended two sessions, said the negotiations are
stalled on at least two points —how many rooms would be available
for USC guests and USC’s unwillingness to say it won’t build more
hotels.
“I think the fact that they won’t agree not to build more
(hotels) goes against all the reasons they’ve given for wanting this
hotel in the first place,” Aughtry said.
Other participants in the talks have included USC trustees Mack
Whittle and Eddie Floyd; USC chief finance officer Rick Kelly; hotel
association executive Tom Sponseller; and Clarion Townhouse co-owner
Henry L. “Hank” Holliday III.
Holliday, who also owns Charleston’s Planters Inn, has been a
prime mover behind the effort to stop the hotel. He has donated
$4,000 to Sanford’s political campaigns since 1996.
Sanford and Carter have declined to discuss the negotiations.
“The negotiations haven’t been easy because, quite frankly,
there’s not a lot of trust on either side,” Sanford spokesman Folks
said. “I think we’re in a wait-and-see mode now.”
Aughtry said he’s not optimistic about a compromise before
Wednesday’s City Council vote on the hotel plan. Lawsuits to hold up
the hotel could be imminent, he added.
“I’d hate to see it come to that,” he said. “I think everyone
hoped there would be some reasonable conclusion to this.”