BUILDING OUR CITY Bull Street design is unveiled Architect recommends saving portions of Babcock Building
and trees on former State Hospital campus By JEFF WILKINSON Staff Writer
A Miami-based architect hired to redesign the old State Hospital
campus on Bull Street is advocating that six of the 54 buildings be
saved — among them the central part of the iconic Babcock Building —
as well as about 75 percent of the trees.
Also, Andres Duany, of the Duany Plater-Zyberk & Co. firm, is
advocating an underground stream, now in culverts under the
property, be “daylighted” and enlarged into a small lake. The flood
plain around it then could be used for hiking and biking trails.
Those recommendations, revealed to government officials Tuesday,
are far from final. They are the first flurry of ideas in a weeklong
input and planning session. By the end of next week, the sessions
are expected to produce a redevelopment blueprint for the site’s 148
acres.
The public meetings are being held at the Columbia Metropolitan
Convention Center.
“The majority of the buildings are terrible — from the low point
of Western architecture,” said Duany, referring to the many
utilitarian structures built during the 1960s and 1970s. “The trees
are the glory of the site.”
The buildings and trees are two of the stickiest issues in the
campus’ redevelopment. But Duany said he wanted to offer the
suggestions early to spur debate.
“Lightning (controversy) is going to strike, so I would rather it
strike at the beginning so it can be part of the (discussion),” he
said. “I like to stir the pot.”
The controversy from Tuesday’s suggestions includes:
• Keeping so many trees takes
valuable land out of play and limits site plans for developers
• Rehabilitating buildings such as
Babcock, which is in the National Register of Historic Places, is an
expensive proposition. Babcock is expected to cost $20 million.
• Tearing down some buildings will
irk preservationists.
Duany said he is advocating saving only portions of the Babcock
and Williams buildings — older, central sections that are more
architecturally or historically significant.
For instance, he advocates eliminating the outer wings of
Babcock, saving the inner wings, the central skeleton and two dining
halls.
“It would be a surgical strike,” he said of the partial
demolition.
However, preservationists say the list of buildings should be
expanded to include a cluster of outbuildings behind Babcock— brick
structures that tell the story of asylum life.
“If they exclude the buildings behind Babcock, they are missing a
piece of the picture that adds significantly to the uniqueness of
that place,” said Robin Waites, executive director of the Historic
Columbia Foundation.
In addition to Babcock, Duany advocated retaining:
• The Chapel of Hope, which was
built with bricks from the asylum’s old wall
• A gymnasium and library across
the street from the chapel
• The Wilson building, which would
be perfect for a Montessori school, Duany said
• The central, pillared section of
the Williams Building
• A greenhouse at the back of the
property
Duany also said the underground Smith Branch would make a natural
greenway through the property. It could be lined with bike paths
that lead to nearby government and hospital complexes. The creek
also could be expanded into a lake that would serve as a water
feature and retention pond.
Reach Wilkinson at jwilkinson@thestate.com. |