Memories of John
Paul offer cause to celebrate, not mourn
A PROTESTANT friend was kind enough to write and offer
condolences on the day Pope John Paul II died.
“Though the Pope is respected world wide, I know that you of the
Catholic faith especially mourn his death,” she wrote. “My prayers
are with you as you grieve for this very special man...”
But all I could think to write back was: “This might sound awful,
but I’m not grieving. I’m happy and thankful that he was our pontiff
for 26 years. I’m grateful for the tremendous role he played in
advancing freedom, working to bring different faiths together, and
affirming the things that the church stands for without compromise
or apology.”
That seemed insufficient, so I went on to explain that the pope
had been “suffering, and with his work done, his time had come. Now
he has gone to his certain reward. I’m glad for him. He was a
vigorous and athletic man for most of his life (I just saw some
pictures from his visit here, and it is amazing how different he
looked then), so his long decline had to be especially difficult for
him. I’m glad he doesn’t have to endure that any longer. In fact, he
is now free of all sorrow, and with God. So... it makes more sense
to celebrate his life than to mourn his death....”
Maybe that sounded cold. What I wrote seemed to make sense, but
maybe there was something wrong with me — aside from the usual
excuse, which is that when news happens, a newsman isn’t supposed to
emote; there’s work to be done.
Anyway, I was relieved when I saw a release from U.S. Rep. Jim
Clyburn on the day before the funeral: “In the Southern tradition, I
join in the worldwide celebration of Pope John Paul II’s homegoing.
Today is not a day to mourn his passing, but to rejoice in the
extraordinary life of the Holy Father,” the congressman said. “Pope
John Paul II devoted himself to the sacred mission bestowed upon
him, and he is now enjoying his well-earned reward.”
So it wasn’t just me.
Things would have been different, for me and for the world, if
Mehmet Ali Agca had succeeded in killing this pope in 1981. That
would have been worth mourning, even though we couldn’t yet know how
much we had lost. The Solidarity movement, and hope for the wave of
freedom that later swept across Eastern Europe, might have died with
him. He would not have lived to travel the world and inspire poor
and oppressed people everywhere.
And it could so easily have happened. I realize that more acutely
than most. As it happens, 1981 was the year that I became a
Catholic. That’s not something I did casually, but rather after much
searching and questioning. I got a lot of help in that from the Rev.
Jay Jackson. Before studying for the priesthood, Father Jay had been
a reporter at the same Tennessee paper where I worked when I met
him; we had played softball together when he was just plain “Jay.”
All that made him easy to talk to, and he had the right answers for
me.
Only weeks after I entered the Church, the pope was shot. I was
in South Carolina for my brother’s college graduation. When I flew
back to Memphis, my wife had bad news when she picked me up at the
airport: Father Jay had been shot to death.
His death briefly made national news, because of initial
speculation that it was a copycat killing inspired by the shooting
of John Paul. But it was just a random thing. His killer, already in
prison for murder, had escaped, killed a policeman in Memphis and
then used the cop’s gun to kill Father Jay when he caught the man
burglarizing the rectory.
Father Jay was a brand-new priest, energetic and full of promise,
and we did mourn him. He never got to finish his mission the way the
pope did.
The memory of John Paul II will remain special to me for another
personal reason: In 1987, I was at a personal and professional low
point. My job as an editor in Wichita, Kan., had gone very sour.
Every day I dragged myself in to work at that paper was worse than
the one before. I was exhausted and dispirited, and undergoing
counseling for depression. I had to get out of there.
The opportunity came to interview for a job at The State, the
largest paper in the state of my birth, in the town where my parents
lived. Compared to Kansas, moving to a place where my children could
grow up with their grandparents at hand sounded wonderful. But how
could I be assured — especially in my depression — that my work life
would improve? Though making a lateral move, I would have to take a
pay cut, and would this job be any better than the last?
In my very first interview here, fellow Catholic convert Tom
McLean happened to mention that the pope was about to come here.
Right here, to Protestant Columbia. (Not only that, but to St.
Peter’s Church, which would become our new parish home, and where my
wife now serves as youth director.)
It may sound silly, but that made me feel better. It was a sign.
The pope choosing Columbia as his destination seemed as unlikely as
the fact that the company I worked for had just bought The State,
right out of the blue. I felt like I was being nudged. And just in
case the pope wasn’t enough, Billy Graham was coming here as well.
(And both would appear at Williams-Brice Stadium, right next door to
where The State was then located.) Billy Graham was less surprising,
but still — it was like God was sending all his troops to help show
me the way.
I doubt that my experience is likely to count toward those two
miracles John Paul needs to become a saint, but hey, I figure it
can’t hurt, so I offer up my humble tale. Like the rest of the
world, I owe the guy.
But I’m not grieving.
I’m just glad for us that we had him as long as we did, and I’m
glad for him that he’s home now. If anybody deserves that rest and
reward, he does.
Write to Mr. Warthen at bwarthen@thestate.com. |