EDITORIAL
Tilting at
I-73 Horry councilmen would be best to
work on RIDE II
Here's the problem with ultimatums: If the group you're trying to
influence refuses to budge, you have no choice but to use the
leverage you've threatened to apply. So it looks as though Horry
County Councilmen Howard Barnard and John Boyd will be going to
Columbia next week to vent their unhappiness with the S.C.
Department of Transportation.
The gentlemen, along with the rest of County Council, want the
DOT to consider routing the long-awaited Interstate 73 through
southern Horry County. Never mind that the DOT dropped that part of
the county from I-73 route considerations about a year ago, citing
objections from federal agencies and environmental concerns as the
reasons.
It apparently didn't register with Boyd that the interstate most
likely would touch some part of his sprawling western Horry County
Council district. Nor did it register with Barnard that this I-73
routing choice would not give South Strand residents their
long-craved storm-evacuation route.
They and the rest of the council only woke up to the implications
of that 2004 decision this year, after the agency further narrowed
its considerations to routes that would link up with S.C. 22 hear
Aynor. Boyd, having gotten an earful on this decision from unhappy
constituents, exhorted the council to fight this decision. Council
members responded this month with a resolution beseeching the DOT to
resume consideration of a route through southern Horry County. It
passed unanimously.
No matter. The DOT last week rejected the council's resolution,
effectively quashing members' belated show of interest in the I-73
project. Instead, the agency will concentrate on refining the
western Horry County route to minimize disruption of family farms
and rural communities.
Barnard and Boyd, however, served notice on the agency that
highway planners have until the end of next week to reopen
consideration of a southern Horry County route.
If the agency fails to comply, the two said they would denounce
it at a news conference from the steps of the S.C. Capitol in
Columbia. The event promises to be a spectacle that further confirms
inland suspicions that Horry County folks march to a drummer whose
cadence is inaudible in the rest of South Carolina.
As DOT officials have pointed out, changing course on I-73 now
would set planning back for years, limiting or eliminating federal
financial support for the project.
But as Barnard's letter on today's editorial page makes clear,
this message is not getting through.
Don't misunderstand: The South Strand needs and deserves better
highways. But I-73 was never the right candidate to fulfill the
area's road needs because federal funding, if it comes, will
be tight.
The project must be built for the lowest cost possible, which is
why tying it to already-built S.C. 22 is so attractive.
The solution for the South Strand lies in the county's proposed
Road Improvement Development Effort II plan, which includes
extending Carolina Bays Parkway from S.C. 544 to S.C. 707 near
Holmestown Road.
As the parkway likely will become part of Interstate 74, that
extension would provide residents from the Georgetown County line to
Surfside Beach the first-class evacuation route they crave. Rather
than tilt at windmills in Columbia, the better bet for Barnard and
other council members would be to come up with a realistic plan for
financing RIDE II, and let the DOT get on with building I-73. |