EDITORIALS
Pushing for
Interstate Designations Elliott has
power to block resolution that could show Strand wants
access
Today or Thursday will be the last opportunity before the General
Assembly adjourns for the year for members to approve a resolution
supporting the designation of S.C. 22, or Veterans Highway, as part
of the proposed Interstate 73. The resolution also supports the
naming of S.C. 31, or Carolina Bays Parkway, as part of the proposed
Interstate 74.
The outcome rests in the hands of Sen. Dick Elliott, D-North
Myrtle Beach. As chairman of the committee looking for a compromise
between House and Senate versions of the bill, Elliott has the power
to block it. That's what he did two years ago.
Rep. Tracy Edge, R-North Myrtle Beach, introduced the measure in
the House, and Sen. Luke Rankin, R-Myrtle Beach, introduced a
similar one in the Senate.
Elliott has said he supports the I-73 part of the resolution, but
he has opposed the I-74 portion, saying the choice depends on the
route North Carolina picks for it through that state. Edge has said
Elliott is balking because his family owns property that could be in
the path of I-74.
This week, Elliott needs to get behind the resolution rather than
stand in the way of it. The measure carries no legal weight, but it
would send a strong message to federal officials who control the
highway-building purse strings that residents of our region want
this interstate access.
It is absurd that the Grand Strand, the area of South Carolina
draws the largest number of tourists into the state, is so far from
an interstate.
Most Grand Strand leaders have worked hard to present a unified
front on the matter. They get the economic importance of the road
projects to our area. Elliott needs to get on board. |