Planned terminal
faces more challenges Georgia, which
owns proposed site, wants to stop S.C. county from condemning
land By BEN
WERNER Staff
Writer
Lawyers representing the state of Georgia are trying to mire the
proposed Jasper County shipping terminal in a legal Catch-22.
The Georgia Department of Transportation, which owns the nearly
1,800 acres of Jasper County riverfront eyed for the proposed
terminal, wants federal and state court rulings to stop the property
from being condemned by the county.
The state suit seeks to prove that the condemnation benefits a
private shipping company, not the public. Meanwhile, the federal
suit wants Jasper County first to prove it has the necessary permits
to build the proposed $450 million shipping terminal before the land
can be condemned.
This is the second time Jasper County officials have tried to
condemn the land.
They have sought to develop the property into a shipping terminal
for nearly 15 years, but it is owned by the state of Georgia, which
has declined to sell.
The property is one of 14 sites along the river used by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers to store muck dredged from the Savannah
River’s shipping channel.
The Corps holds long-term and perpetual easements on the land.
These federal easements are part of the property’s title and would
require the Corps’ release before any development could occur.
“They’re trying to take Georgia’s property without going through
the appropriate analysis to see if they can use that property,” said
Richard Bybee, the Charleston attorney representing Georgia.
In response, Jasper County officials say they can’t get the Corps
to consider releasing the land from its easements or grant other
environmental permits until the county owns land.
“The Corps won’t talk to anybody except the person who owns the
property,” said Rose Dobson, Jasper County’s deputy administrator
for economic development and planning.
Dobson suggests that a deal with the Corps could be reached
because the county’s shipping terminal ultimately would need to use
only 4 percent of the dumping capacity.
However, if the federal courts agree with Georgia, the ruling
could be a fatal blow to the county’s plans.
The Corps of Engineers already has signaled its intent to
continue using the land for dredging. During Jasper County’s first
attempt to condemn the property, Corps lawyer William Hough sent a
letter stating the federal agency’s position.
“At no time has the Army Corps of Engineers provided any
assurances to Jasper County regarding modification of the
easements,” he wrote.
Meanwhile, Bybee also finds himself arguing in S.C. court that
Jasper County’s condemnation really is to the benefit of a private
company, Seattle-based SSA Marine.
The state case is similar to the one Bybee won two years ago,
when the S.C. Supreme Court ruled unanimously to overturn the
county’s condemnation.
Under Jasper County’s plan this time, officials say the county
would own the land — through a county-established ports authority —
and lease the terminal to SSA, through a $4 million annual fee and a
$2-per-container profit sharing fee.
Construction would be paid for by revenue bonds issued by Jasper
County, but would be guaranteed by SSA. The shipping terminal’s
operation would pay for the bonds.
There are no trial dates set for the lawsuits.
Bybee intends to argue that the relationship between Jasper
County and SSA still amounts to condemning land for a private
company.
“We were successful with one bullet last time. But we do believe
there are appropriate remedies in both court systems.”
Reach Werner at (803) 771-8509 or bwerner@thestate.com |