Go!
  Website (7 days)
Archive (2000->)
 
 
   Local news
   Business
   Politics
   Sports
     Clemson
     USC
     Furman
     High Schools
     SAIL swimming
     Racing
     Outdoors
     Bombers
   Obituaries
   Opinion
   Homes
   Health
   Education
   Features
   Fashion
   Weddings
   City People
   Nation/World
   Technology
   Weather
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  (864) 298-4100
(800) 800-5116

Subscription services
(800) 736-7136

Manage your account
Home Delivery
Gift subscription
Contact Us

 
  305 S. Main St.
PO Box 1688
Greenville, SC 29602

Newspaper in Educ.
Community Involvement
Our history
Ethics principles

Send:
 A story idea
 A press release
 A letter to the editor

Find:
 A news story
 An editor or reporter
 An obituary




More diversity on the bench

Posted Thursday, June 9, 2005 - 10:01 pm





e-mail this story
discuss this issue in our forums


It didn't take a legislative study to tell former state lawmaker I.S. Leevy Johnson, a Columbia lawyer, that there is not enough diversity on the bench in South Carolina. Calling the study by the Senate Judiciary Committee "a waste of time, money and effort," he told The State newspaper, it "only confirms what black legislators have been saying since 1970."

And what black legislators have been saying — along with at least a few female lawyers and legislators — is that white men have an easier time making it into a black robe in this state. This issue has been simmering for years, and it got quite a bit of attention last year when civil rights leader and South Carolina native Jesse Jackson threatened to sue this state over the outrageous lack of diversity on the bench. Jackson's proposed solution was the popular election of judges, but that would only give our state, in the words of state Supreme Court Chief Justice Jean Toal, "the worst system you could possibly have."

In her annual State of the Judiciary speech last year, Toal told lawmakers they need to figure out a way to get more minorities on the bench. A year has come and gone, and lawmakers are no closer to a solution.

The legislative study released just as lawmakers were heading home for the summer showed the Legislature is more inclined to choose men over women and white candidates over black candidates. The study covered the 30-year period since this state has had a legislative screening process, and looked at 728 judicial races involving 1,236 candidates. The State found that in the past eight years in races that didn't feature an incumbent, 27 percent of white candidates were elected, 20 percent of women were elected and 11 percent of the black candidates were elected.

The results confirmed, Toal told The State, "the position I've taken ever since I became chief that our bench does not adequately reflect the diversity that is South Carolina." In our state, women are 51 percent of the population and blacks are 30 percent.

As Toal pointed out last year, the number of minorities on the bench does mirror the number of minorities who pass the state's bar exam.

There's obviously no easy solution to creating a more diverse judiciary in South Carolina. The state needs to find ways to encourage more minorities to go to law school. Then minorities and women must be motivated by a remarkable commitment to public service and a willingness to bypass the bigger paychecks that come with a successful private practice. Finally, like it or not, they must run for a judgeship and engage in politicking for the job.

Most importantly, state lawmakers must be willing to fairly evaluate minority and female judicial candidates and show a commitment to increasing diversity on the bench. So far, they have failed in this area.

Friday, June 10  


news | communities | entertainment | classifieds | shopping | real estate | jobs | cars | customer services

Copyright 2003 The Greenville News. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service (updated 12/17/2002).


GannettGANNETT FOUNDATION USA TODAY