Seat belt bill
can’t be killed unless supporters let it
THE HOUSE HAS overwhelmingly passed legislation to let police
enforce our seat belt law — twice.
Thirty of the 46 senators support the measure, which has
consistently increased seat belt use, and thus lowered the death
rate, in every state that has passed it.
The latest polls show 60 percent of South Carolinians support
primary seat belt enforcement. Voters are getting increasingly
angered by the Senate’s refusal to act. And every day that the 16
opponents refuse to allow a vote, more bills back up on the
calendar, and the chance of passing tort reform and tax cuts and
dozens of other measures important to those 16 senators — and to the
other 30, as well as the special interests who bankroll all their
campaigns — diminishes.
The pressure on those 16 obstructionists should be intense.
Passing the legislation should be a slam-dunk. All the majority of
senators has to do is show up for work every day — and stay on the
job until opponents’ lungs wear out or their bladders wear out or
the many forces supporting this bill and others convince them to let
the Senate get on with the business of the state.
But this is South Carolina. And as is too often the case, it is
the people fighting to improve our state who are aching to give in.
Last week, several senators who say they support a real seat belt
law started complaining about how this debate is dragging on too
long, about how it is blocking work on other important legislation.
Amazingly, their solution is to throw up their hands in defeat — in
defeat, despite the fact that they outnumber opponents two-to-one on
this.
It’s true that this bill has been at the top of the Senate’s
agenda for the entire year. But until the week before last, senators
had routinely skipped over it and worked on other bills. Even since
supporters stopped allowing this, the Senate still has spent
precious little time on the matter. So far this year, they’ve stayed
on the job, sitting through the debate, for less time than most of
us spend on the job in three days. That’s right, this debate has
“dragged on” for about 20 hours — over the course of three
months.
This is ridiculous. It is time to say we are not going to allow
the minority to dictate state policy; we are not going to allow
obstructionists to win simply by being obstructionist. That’s what
we’ve always done in this state. And look where it’s gotten us.
Putting our foot down is not an outrageous idea. The good and
noble idea behind the Senate’s filibuster rules is to make sure the
minority has a chance to be heard, to try to change minds; it is not
to thwart the will of the majority. There was a time when a third of
the Senate fighting legislation favored by the other two-thirds
would lose, because the Senate would stay at work all day long, all
night if needed, day after day. Do this for a week, and there’s
little doubt that opponents would back down, or else supporters
would force them to (as the rules already allow them to do, if they
so choose).
Let’s be very clear: Any senators who agree to give up on this
bill care more about their own convenience and comfort and about
getting along than they care about the lives of innocent South
Carolinians. They can claim they support a real seat belt law all
they want, but it’s not true. Not if they give in.
Seat belt opponents cannot win this fight unless supporters let
them. Supporters cannot lose this fight unless they choose to. |