COLUMBIA, S.C. - A new projection showing
state revenues should grow could be a gift for legislators and Gov.
Mark Sanford
The state Board of Economic Advisors said Thursday that state
revenues should increase by $466.9 million in the 2007 budget year,
which begins next July.
Because legislators used one-time sources of money in the fiscal
2006 spending plan,only about $310 million of the new revenue isn't
already accounted for in the next budget year.
The board also raised its revenue estimate for the current, 2006
fiscal year by more than $240 million. If the estimate holds true,
the extra money will go into the fiscal 2007 budget.
A surge in income and sales tax collections between July and
October is responsible for the revenue growth. Individual income tax
collections soared 9.5 percent, bringing in $100.1 million more than
earlier estimates. Sales tax collections were up 7.4 percent, or
$22.4 million more than expected.
After years of struggling to balance the state budget after the
2001 recession, John Rainey, the economic board's chairman, had five
words that cut to the bottom line: "Happy days are here again."
The confidence and brighter outlook come despite unemployment and
other economic reports that show South Carolina with one of the
nation's highest jobless rates and incomes that lag behind most of
the nation.
Rainey and others say that data doesn't reflect what's really
going on in the state's economy.
"We believe that the economy of South Carolina is sound," Rainey
said.
It's timely and good news for Sanford.
Democrats have been thrashing the Republican governor on the
economic numbers. Thursday's estimates "show once again that we're
gaining strength with respect to our economy," Sanford said in a
prepared statement.
Sanford took credit for that. "Small businesses across the state
are beginning to realize the impact of our income tax cut, and we're
seeing revenues increase as they grow and expand those businesses,"
he said.
Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer said the governor campaigned on
cutting small business taxes.
In an effort to attract wealthy executives and retirees to the
state, Sanford persuaded the House to lower the state's individual
income tax rate. But the Senate scuttled that, fearing its $1
billion price tag would hurt the state's Triple-A credit rating.
Sanford then resisted plans that pared the proposal so it affected
only small business owners. When he later signed the legislation,
Sanford called it "a third of a loaf."
Sanford's staff now is writing his executive budget.
"Anything that's left over should be used to repay the state's
past debt or provide relief for taxpayers," Sawyer said. Legislators
raided trust and other accounts to balance budgets during lean years
and repaying that could cost $200 million, Sawyer said.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dan Cooper says there may
not be much extra money when rising costs are considered.
For instance, about $109 million is needed to cover higher
Medicaid expenses for the elderly, poor and disabled and more than
$80 million is required to keep pace with a school funding formula,
said Cooper, R-Piedmont.
All told, there are about $330 million in demands on the extra
money, Cooper said.
"I don't think we should get overly zealous over it," Cooper
said.