thread-index: AdBZybysUHQJDWz2QW+Q0ZUfoDUQCg==
Thread-Topic: New Temperature Model Deals Blow To Global Warming Alarmists
From: <governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com>
To: <governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com>
Subject: New Temperature Model Deals Blow To Global Warming Alarmists
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:00:18 -0400
Message-ID: <0A3D9DB546F346D0A04DC90D82AE67E5@IQ12>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal

<APP>CUSTOM
<PREFIX>Mrs.</PREFIX>
<FIRST>Annette</FIRST>
<MIDDLE></MIDDLE>
<LAST>Savoie</LAST>
<SUFFIX></SUFFIX>
<TITLE></TITLE>
<ORGANIZATION></ORGANIZATION>
<ADDR1>2999 Gabrysh Ave. se</ADDR1>
<ADDR2></ADDR2>
<CITY>Palm Bay</CITY>
<STATE>FL</STATE>
<ZIP>32909</ZIP>
<EMAIL>alouette8@juno.com</EMAIL>
<PHONE_H>321-725-5559</PHONE_H>
<PHONE_B></PHONE_B>
<ISSUE>ENVI</ISSUE>
<SUBJECT>New Temperature Model Deals Blow To Global Warming Alarmists</SUBJECT>
<MSG>
New Temperature Model Deals Blow To Global Warming Alarmists

Authors note that there has been an 18 year pause in global temperature increase

http://www.westernjournalism.com/new-temperature-model-deals-blow-global-warming/?utm_source=MailChimp&amputm_medium=email&amputm_content=featured-stories&amputm_campaign=DailyEmail03.07.15#seFAuty2rM0g0Xke.97

By F. Peter Brown
March 6, 2015

A new temperature model has sparked debate about the extent of global warming.
An article found in the journal Science Bulletin is called Why Models Run Hot: Results from an Irreducibly Simple Climate Model; it has introduced a simpler model for understanding the addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
According to the think tank The Heartland Institute, "The new model tracks temperatures and temperature trends more closely than the complex climate models used by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)."
The authors of the paper are Lord Christopher Monckton; Astrophysicist Willie Soon, Ph.D.; climatologist and geologist David Legates, Ph.D.; and statistician William Briggs.
The authors note that the complex climate models such as those used by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have significantly overstated the amount of warming during the past 150 years.
Also, they note that there has been an 18 year pause in temperature increase, a fact that is not included in the more complex temperature models.
Lord Monckton spoke about the model to Environment and Climate News:

"The errors of the enormously complex climate models are attributable to a well-kept secret: Doubling atmospheric CO2 concentrations should result in an average global warming of just 1 degree Celsius, and possibly less than half that, but climate modelers erroneously assume 'temperature feedbacks'-climatic changes triggered by a direct warming such as from CO2-triple warming. Without the assumed tripling, there is no climate problem."

Monckton also said: "The simple model presented in Science Bulletin has received extensive coverage and has been downloaded more than 10,000 times from the journal's website, a near-unprecedented hit-rate for a scientific paper."
Monckton is not alone in his acceptance of the new temperature model. The Heartland Institute notes that a "number of scientists stepped forward to defend the Science Bulletin paper."
In fact, Miroslav Kutilek, emeritus professor at Czech Technical University in Prague, stated:

"The results from complex computer models in common use do not agree with observations of reality. They lack validity because, when tested, they do not reflect well the climates of the past. In addition, they seem to underestimate some forcing factors while overestimating others. The complex models also entirely miss long-term processes, large scale, primary oceanic processes, driving regional climate."


</MSG>

</APP>