COLUMBIA, S.C. - A state Senate subcommittee
has revised what to include in a bill that would cut property taxes
by raising the state sales tax.
The Senate's soon-to-be-drafted bill will not deal with
residents' second, non-rented homes and "other" personal property
such as boats, even though the senators decided last month to
include those items. It also won't immediately eliminate the sales
tax on groceries, as decided last week.
Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston, said
Wednesday the previous decisions would cause a $390 million revenue
shortfall.
"The cold hard facts are this," he told the joint Senate
judiciary and finance subcommittees. "Something needs to come
out."
Suggestions to increase the state sales tax by 2.5 cents, rather
than 2 cents, went nowhere. Half of the committee's 12 members were
willing to do so - not enough to suggest it would pass the full
Senate.
"We need to come up with something we can pass," said Sen. Hugh
Leatherman, R-Florence. "If not, there will be no relief."
The senators did agree to cut property taxes on owner-occupied
homes and vehicles, give renters a tax credit, and put $125 million
in a reserve fund for lean years. The state sales tax on groceries
would be reduced to 2 percent the first year, and eliminated in
future years. Residents who rent all 12 months in a tax year could
check a box on their IRS form to get extra money back in their
refund.
The Senate's proposal would cut only school operating expenses
from property tax bills, unlike a version being drafted in the House
that would also cut city and county operating costs, all on
owner-occupied homes.
"Education is clearly the state's responsibility. It's an easy
part to roll up," McConnell said. "Fifty percent relief is better
than no relief." School operating expenses account for more than
half of residents' property taxes.
State Sen. David Thomas, R-Greenville, said he would try to
broaden the Senate's version when it goes to the floor.
Leatherman said, "I'd like to join you in saying, 'Let's take it
all off.' But that's not political reality."
McConnell expects to have a draft of the bill for the
subcommittees' next meeting Dec. 1.
"We've reached consensus. It means reform is on the way," he
said. "If I were the public, I would be excited."
Sen. Wes Hayes, R-Rock Hill, often cast the lone nay vote
Wednesday. He said he fundamentally disagrees with supplanting
property taxes with increased sales taxes.
"It's a tax swap. It's not a tax decrease," Hayes said. "People
need to understand that."
A House committee continued Wednesday to work through issues of
its version of the property tax bill. It decided to set up a reserve
fund too, but not through a one-time upfront shot. The House version
would set aside any money collected above expectations from the
additional sales tax. House members also agreed to review a load of
sales tax exemptions in 2010 and eliminate any the General Assembly
doesn't continue to support.
The House property tax committee will meet again Dec. 7.
"It seems to me there are still a lot of unresolved issues," said
Roy Parker, who lives on the Lexington side of Lake Murray and
attended the Senate subcommittee meeting. His property taxes
increased 32 percent this year. "There's lots of work to do to get
satisfactory property tax
relief."