Customer Service: Subscribe Now | Manage your account | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Help
 GreenvilleOnline.com ? Weather ? Calendar ? Jobs ? Cars ? Homes ? Apartments ? Classifieds ? Shopping ? Dating
 
  • Search the Upstate:
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Greenville News
305 S. Main St.
PO Box 1688
Greenville, SC 29602

(864) 298-4100
(800) 800-5116

Subscription services
(800) 736-7136

Newspaper in Educ.
Community Involvement
Our history
Ethics principles

Send:
A story idea
A press release
A letter to the editor

Find:
A news story
An editor or reporter
An obituary

Photo reprints:
Submit a request

RSS Feeds
Top Stories, Breaking News
Add to My Yahoo!
Local News
Add to My Yahoo!
Business
Add to My Yahoo!
Sports
Add to My Yahoo!
Opinion
Add to My Yahoo!
Entertainment
Add to My Yahoo!

Get news on your smartphone!
Get the latest headlines and stories from The Greenville News on your smartphone or PDA.

[ Point here ] [ Learn more ]

Advertisement
Wednesday, January 10    |    Upstate South Carolina News, Sports and Information

Tax law called a brake on new jobs
State business leaders call for sweeping change

Published: Sunday, January 7, 2007 - 6:00 am


By Jenny Munro and Tim Smith
STAFF WRITERS
jmunro@greenvillenews.com


What's your view? Click here to add your comment to this story.

COLUMBIA -- As lawmakers prepare to return to work and address Gov. Mark Sanford's call for a $205 million tax relief plan, business leaders say the state's tax system is broken and in dire need of fixing.

"It's going to start affecting jobs and the ability of the state to grow," said Hunter Howard, president of the South Carolina Chamber of Commerce.

South Carolina has passed numerous tax changes individually, the latest a swap that reduced taxes on residential property owners while raising the sales tax, they said.

That "was quite punitive to business," said Harris DeLoach, chairman of Sonoco Products and chairman of the South Carolina Chamber of Commerce.

Advertisement

While large companies that move into the state or expand here can gain some relief through the fee-in-lieu-of-taxes program that cut the tax rate from 10.5 percent to 4 percent, small companies seldom have that option. Also, commercial property is taxed at 6 percent, Howard said.

"The bulk of South Carolina's economy is fueled by small companies, said John Creech, general counsel for the state Chamber.

The business community in the state is facing $250 million more in taxes than before the latest changes, DeLoach said.

Sanford has proposed a tax relief plan that is short on detail. He recommends lawmakers cut $205 million in income taxes but leaves it up to the Legislature to decide whether to reduce individual income taxes, the rates for small business or corporations, or a combination.

Joel Sawyer, a spokesman for Sanford, said the governor's plan would "go a long way" toward addressing business leaders' concerns.

"We would be open to shifting more of the tax relief to small business," he said.

Rep. Dan Cooper, who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, said Sanford's plan isn't really a plan.

"There's no real detail in that budget that he gave us," he said. "He says, 'Let's do it,' and leaves it up to somebody else to figure that out."

Sawyer said Sanford didn't propose more detail on his tax plan because he is in the process of talking with business leaders and lawmakers about what relief would draw the most consensus and have the biggest impact.

Sen. Larry Martin, a Pickens Republican, said the state needs a comprehensive tax review.

"We definitely need to take a look at it, and a thoughtful look," he said.

Although many have suggested that businesses will pass on higher taxes to customers, "it is very difficult to pass on those taxes," DeLoach said.

The state Chamber's Competitiveness Agenda calls for a comprehensive review of the entire tax system, looking at both taxes and exemptions from taxes, he said.

Increasing South Carolina's dependence on sales taxes means the state is "vulnerable to a bad economy," he said.

Also, the state Chamber is calling for a cap on local government spending -- something DeLoach doesn't personally like but believes is a necessary short-term action.

Sawyer said Sanford favors a cap on local government spending, but only if it is paired with a cap on state spending.

DeLoach and other state businessmen said a study does no good if it sits on a shelf with previous tax studies, and they don't know how to ensure that legislators and the public listen.

"It may take a train wreck to cause this to happen," he said.

That train wreck could be when local government cannot raise enough money to pay salaries or maintain services. It could be when a bad economy slashes sales tax revenues.

He said he thinks it would be difficult to accomplish the study and take action to make the tax system fair and equitable to all parties in a year, but a start needs to be made.

Another issue to address is the deterioration of the road system, he said.

"Some of the roads in our state are in bad condition. That is one issue that businesses look at" when making decisions about sites for new facilities or expansion, he said.

Sonoco Products won't locate a facility in California because of the cost of doing business there, he said.

South Carolina "is not there today. We could get there" if nothing is done to hold down the costs of doing business in the state.

DeLoach said legislators and the executive branch of state government need to come together with business leaders to "set a road map" to help the state reach a major goal -- a higher per-capita income for every citizen.

"It's time to put personal agendas aside," he said.


Article tools

 E-mail this story
 Print this story
 Get breaking news, briefings e-mailed to you

Related
STREAMING AUDIO:
Harris DeLoach talks about impact of tax law on businesses.

Related news from the Web


Sponsored links

 

StoryChat Post a CommentPost a Comment   View all CommentsView All Comments

penelope541 onebubba "Why is the workmans comp. cost in South Carolina almost two times the dollars compared with North Carolina? Same type of business."

Several reasons in my view (and not necessarily in order of importance):

-We live in a state largely controlled by the insurance industry (Count the number of state assemblymen and senators who are connected with the insurance industry, then add the number of insurance lobbyists who are contributing to campaigns, buying dinners, paying for other favors, etc.)

-S.C. is a much smaller state than N.C., both in population and geography.

-South Carolina isn't particularly active in enforcing safety standards in businesses. For this reason, we have more lost time accidents than N.C.

-Most people who partake of Worker's Comp. benefits lose their jobs. After that, they get a lawyer and sue. They usually lose, but the expense of the suit is calculated into the equation.

penelope541 Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:49 pm

onebubba Why is the workmans comp. cost in South Carolina almost two times the dollars compared with North Carolina? Same type of business.

onebubba Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:39 pm

thelittleguy Since the majority of jobs in SC are from small businesses, then I'ld take my chances on cutting small business taxes only.

I haven't seen many large corporations put the needs of the average SC guy first in any of their plans.

thelittleguy Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:31 pm

mechdave The ol saying is ya get who ya voted for.
Mark Sanfords budget plan will cost all teachers in the public school system their pensions.
Many in house jobs (State/government workers) are in danger of elimination via privatizing.
To me, factory jobs are lost because of South Carolinas generosity towards illegal aliens in giving them drivers licenses far easier than ss cards.. The cost excuses for sonoco is for that reason. Dont believe me now, wait some years later. By then it will be realized and it will be too late for us with a 1 million plus illegal population.

Many reelected our governor. I feel the least bit sorry for what is happining in the legislature. It is our vote and our fault.

mechdave Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:31 am

wertach Quote "Sonoco Products won't locate a facility in California because of the cost of doing business there, he said."

And that is why they closed the Fountain Inn plant. Then they came back later because they could hire cheaper labor! The laid off textile workers!

Is that the reason you closed the plant in Canada? Too much $$$$?

wertach Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:28 am

Post a CommentPost a Comment   View all CommentsView All Comments

Advertisement


GannettGANNETT FOUNDATION

Copyright 2005 The Greenville News.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, updated June 7, 2005.

USA WEEKEND USA TODAY