By Liv Osby HEALTH WRITER losby@greenvillenews.com
|
 What's
your view? Click
here to add your comment to this story.
| |
Planned Parenthood Health Systems says two bills on the
legislative agenda are backdoor attempts to limit legal abortions in
South Carolina, but sponsors of the bills say the group's concerns
are unwarranted.
The first bill, S.84, would require an ultrasound to determine
the gestational age of the fetus that would be shown to patients
before all abortions. It also would mandate that a patient or her
parent or guardian get information about fetal development and
alternatives to abortion.
Lindsay Siler, public affairs coordinator for Planned Parenthood,
said the bill's "oppressive restrictions" put politics above the
health and safety of women.
"In South Carolina, we already have counseling and mandatory
delay, and now a woman has to review an ultrasound and sign off on
it?" she said. "It's another intimidation tactic aimed at
restricting access."
Advertisement
|
 |
But Sen. Kevin L. Bryant, a sponsor of the bill, said it just
beefs up the counseling.
"I feel the child in the womb does have rights, but I don't think
this limits anyone's access to an abortion," he said. "It does allow
for a more informed decision because the mother would see a picture
of the child in the womb."
He said he is told "that lots of folks who get the ultrasound
choose to keep the child."
The bill has been referred to the Senate Medical Affairs
Committee, on which Bryant, R-Anderson, will serve this year.
The second measure, H.3019, would declare a fetus a person in the
case of a civil action.
"For instance, if a woman lost her baby in a personal injury
situation (like a car accident) or somebody attacked her, she could
sue civilly," said one of the bill's sponsors, Rep. F. Gregory
Delleney Jr., R-Chester and York. "However, it doesn't affect
abortions. Abortions are specifically excluded."
"Last year, we dealt with the criminal aspect of this in the
Unborn Victims of Violence law, and this basically does the same
thing for civil actions. It specifically does not deal with the
medical procedure of abortion," said Rep. Gloria Haskins,
R-Greenville, another sponsor.
"Any concern they have that this is a backdoor attempt to limit
abortions is unfounded."
But Siler said it sets the stage for the rights of the fetus to
supersede those of the pregnant woman. |