Let's get ready to rumble:
The unlikely tag team in this corner - President George W.
"Compassionate Conservative" Bush, right-wing radio star Rush "America's
Truth Detector" Limbaugh and former President Jimmy "National Malaise"
Carter.
The unlikely tag team in the other corner - Sen. Hillary Rodham "It
Takes a Village" Clinton, Senate Majority Leader "Dollar Bill" Frist and
right-wing radio/TV star Sean "Defeating Terrorism, Despotism and
Liberalism" Hannity.
That and other strange match-ups have twisted out of the battle-royal
debate over who should manage six U.S. ports (but not the Port of
Charleston, which reassuringly remains under the home-team management of
the State Ports Authority).
The confusion prompted by such unsettling alliances is surpassed by
fears over which port-policy course to take:
--Let Dubai Ports World manage cargo operations at the ports of New
York, Newark, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Miami, and New Orleans. Critics
charge that this would further jeopardize our already worrisome port
security by granting risky access to a company owned by a nation - the
United Arab Emirates - that doesn't recognize Israel, did recognize the
Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government and was the homeland of two
9/11 hijackers.
--Let the uproar against that transfer of port-management duties from
one foreign (British) company to another foreign (UAE) company scuttle it.
Critics charge that this would be a knee-jerk, xenophobic insult to the
Muslim realm, undermining our already tenuous friendships there while
betraying free-market principles.
Tough call. This perplexed Port City native, while finding both dilemma
options scary, finds the latter scarier under the small-world
circumstances.
But scariest is our seemingly irreversible trend of "outsourcing" jobs
we won't - or can't? - handle ourselves.
As America's slice of the planet's manufacturing pie keeps shrinking,
jitters keep expanding among those of us who remember when we still made
plenty of stuff. Now we can't even make all of our own telemarketing calls
(has anybody else been getting phone-sales pitches from what sounds like
New Delhi?) - or manage all of our own ports.
The Right blames our trade-balance blight on greedy, corrupt unions and
their elected-official accomplices; the Left on greedy, corrupt
corporations and their elected-official accomplices.
Regardless of your preferred economic-erosion villains, however, all
American know-how is not lost. We do still have some valuable exports.
From the Feb. 17 Wall Street Journal: "Chinese firms are going to war
against so-called dumping charges - and U.S. lawyers are a chief
beneficiary of the fighting."
The public and private entities pressing those "dumping" cases argue
"that Chinese factories are able to sell products at unfairly low prices,
thanks to an undervalued currency and government subsidies."
And thanks to U.S. legal firms' initiative, the Chinese now pay high
prices for American legal expertise. Beijing lawyer Zhang Yuquing, former
head of the legal department in China's commerce ministry, told the
Journal:
"When anti-dumping cases are announced, you can see companies receiving
hundreds of pages of faxes pitching different law firms."
At least our lawyers can still compete globally.
At least some folks working at our newspapers can still make a living.
Almost.
At least lots of Americans are still making lots of money and not just
as lawyers.
Yet how long can that prosperity persist if our primary "industry" is
making not tangible products, but paper- chasing-paper deals for real
estate, insurance and mutual funds?
And if we must pay non-Americans to make our TVs, pick our crops,
manage our ports and interrupt our meals with unsolicited phone
solicitations, why must we send our own sons and daughters to fight our -
and other nations' - battles?
Why not outsource that, too?
After all, the Persians (these days known as Iranians, who aren't
Arabs) hired Greek mercenaries 2,500 years ago. The Romans hired Germanic
mercenaries 1,650 years ago. The British hired Germanic - oops, Hessian
mercenaries 230 years ago.
Then again, all three of those examples turned out badly for the
unfortunate empires employing those soldiers of fortune.
So which example of an empire that could no longer do its own essential
work has turned out well?
Frank Wooten is associate editor of The Post and Courier. His
e-mail is wooten@postandcourier.com.