Gay teacher debate
highlights party difference
By MIKE
FAIR Guest
columnist
There is a difference between Democrats and Republicans. The
current presidential campaign and the U.S. Senate campaign in South
Carolina clearly illustrate the opposing philosophies.
I’ll mention one: tolerance.
Democrats believe tolerance is accepting all or most behaviors
and religious beliefs and philosophies as being equal.
On the other hand, Republicans believe that some ideas are
superior and that tolerance is basically a willingness to listen and
extend courtesy to others who do not share our views. This, of
course, is my observation and opinion.
When one considers our children, superior behaviors should be
given more weight. For example, the U.S. Senate candidates in the
first debate differed on the matter of teachers who were openly
homosexual. Inez Tenenbaum said it was un-American to ban these
teachers, and Jim DeMint said he would not allow them to teach.
Furthermore, DeMint was criticized when he said it was
inappropriate for unmarried pregnant teachers to be in the
classroom.
I was alarmed but not surprised when the superintendent of
education said openly that homosexual teachers should be allowed to
teach our children. Hello, is anybody home at Fort Rutledge?
Children model behavior. Children also have a way of attaining
the levels of expectations that their parents and teachers clearly
delineate for them. The Family Research Council, founded by James
Dobson, says that homosexuals proselytize. That, at least, means
that we can expect homosexual teachers to put a favorable slant on
homosexual behavior.
Tenenbaum and most Democrats are OK with that notion. Most
parents in South Carolina and the United States disagree with that
idea.
The same is true with regard to unmarried pregnant teachers. How
does a sex ed teacher tell children not to have sex until they are
married (as required by S.C. law) when the teacher is pregnant and
unmarried?
Teachers are held to a higher standard in South Carolina for the
aforementioned reasons. Their clientele is not longshoreman or truck
drivers. They are influencing the minds of our children on a
minute-by-minute basis.
What is more important: the sexual freedom of adults, or the
safety and well being of children?
Most South Carolinians agree that what one does in private is his
or her business, minors excluded.
Yet what one does in private may become public depending on the
egregiousness of the behavior. Rotten behavior will often show up
even to casual observers as the behaviors manifest themselves in
observable emotional and physical ways.
We don’t want the questionable lifestyles of our teachers to show
up in the behavior of our children.
Sen. Fair is a Greenville Republican. |