Proposed fuel plant
at SRS in jeopardy Hundreds of
millions of dollars for facility frozen, cut; it could have created
1,000 jobs By LAUREN
MARKOE Special to The
State
A congressional panel this week slashed or froze hundreds of
millions of dollars for a proposed mixed-oxide fuel plant at
Savannah River Site, raising renewed doubts about the future of the
planned facility.
The so-called “MOX” project at the nuclear campus outside Aiken
has been touted as both a powerful S.C. job engine and a means to
rid the world of tons of weapons-grade plutonium.
On top of those cuts, SRS is facing a $200 million budget
shortfall in fiscal 2007.
South Carolinians in Congress say the federal government promised
the money, and that without it, an unspecified number of jobs could
be lost and other cleanup missions could stagnate at the nuclear
waste storage site.
Still, there’s reason for hope, these same politicians say — both
for the MOX plant and the SRS budget.
U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and U.S. Rep. Gresham Barrett,
R-S.C., on Wednesday met with Linton Brooks, head of the National
Nuclear Security Administration. Brooks “is committed to building a
MOX plant in South Carolina,” said Graham, who said construction
could begin in the fall.
That’s whether or not, Graham continued, the Russians build a MOX
plant of their own.
For years the Russian and American MOX plants developed — and
stalled — as a joint project.
And Graham, who represented the Aiken area as a congressman, said
he is optimistic the Senate will restore the $200 million SRS budget
shortfall.
But Barrett, who succeeded Graham in the House, worried the money
might not materialize. The Bush administration, he said, hasn’t
pushed hard enough to ensure SRS, which once supplied much of the
fuel for the nation’s nuclear arsenal, gets what it needs.
“We’ve have had a lot of promises and a lot of commitments from
the Department of Energy,” said Barrett. “Unfortunately, many times
the money doesn’t meet the mouth.”
Department of Energy spokesman Jim Giusti cautioned against
drawing conclusions about the funding gap and possible
consequences.
“It is too early in the budget process to discuss specific
actions that could be taken at SRS,” he said.
It will be months until the full House and Senate agree on how
much to send to the site.
As for MOX, U.S. Rep. John Spratt, D-S.C., who supports the
project, sits on the House Armed Services Committee panel that cut
that Bush administration’s $600 million request for the S.C. plant.
Spratt didn’t support the cuts and wants to see the project
succeed.
But realistically, he said, its future now appears “unclear.”
Boosters say the plant could generate 1,000 jobs in South
Carolina. International politics has so far stood in its way.
Russia, with help from the United States, had agreed to build a
MOX plant like the one proposed for SRS. The idea was for the S.C.
and Russian plants to anchor an international effort to transform
weapons-grade plutonium into commercial grade fuel in both
countries. Several other U.S. allies pledged money to the Russian
project to help secure some of the most dangerous nuclear material
in Europe.
Russia, however, has not moved forward on MOX.
“The time is past that we want to bring the Russians along in a
parallel fashion,” said Barrett. “Today is the day that if they
don’t comply, we’re going to forge ahead.”
But Congress is wary about MOX in South Carolina and wants to see
a clear plan before it allocates more money.
On Thursday, the panel of the House Armed Services Committee that
cut $150 million and froze another $450 million for MOX said the
money should not be used until the Bush administration shows either
that the Russians are committed to the project or that the S.C.
plant is by itself worthy of funding.
Spratt is particularly concerned about the 34 metric tons of
weapons-grade plutonium slated for a MOX plant at SRS. Some of it is
already at the site.
In 2001, he supported former Gov. Jim Hodges, a Democrat, in a
lawsuit that sought to stop the federal government from shipping
high-grade nuclear waste to SRS. They argued there was no clear plan
to dispose of the material, and worried it would languish in South
Carolina indefinitely.
Upon taking office in 2003, Republican Gov. Mark Sanford dropped
the suit.
In South Carolina, a consortium including Duke Energy would build
the MOX plant and use the fuel in the company’s Catawba reactor, in
York County, and McGuire reactor, north of Charlotte.
Duke and consortium spokesmen referred all questions on MOX to
the Department of Energy. But Duke spokesman Tim Pettit added those
reactors are not dependent on MOX fuel to provide power.
|