S.C. tries to
arrest Chester sheriff Judge doesn’t
find enough evidence to sign warrant accusing official of domestic
violence By SARAH JANE TRIBBLE
and NICHOLE MONROE BELL The
Charlotte Observer
CHESTER — State law enforcement officials Friday tried to
charge Chester County Sheriff Robby Benson with domestic violence,
but the local magistrate refused to sign the warrant.
Chief Magistrate Dianne Moore, who has worked with the sheriff
for a decade, said there wasn’t enough evidence that Benson had
injured his wife, Marcy, during a March dispute.
“We were ready to prosecute a man for criminal domestic violence
and the judge ended this matter today,” Mark Plowden, spokesman for
the state attorney general, said.
“In the state of South Carolina, a judge has the power to sign or
not to sign an arrest warrant, and that’s the way the laws are set
up ... we can’t re-write the rule book.”
The sheriff’s lawyer called the magistrate “neutral and detached”
and said the criminal justice system had worked.
Neither the sheriff nor his wife would comment Friday.
Benson, 45, and his wife, Marcy, 34, have not been living
together since January, according to court documents.
In March, three days before the sheriff filed for legal
separation, the couple argued behind a Wendy’s in Chester where
Marcy Benson was employed, according to public documents.
They met to talk about “their marriage problems,” a sheriff’s
report said.
Marcy Benson told a deputy who responded to the scene that she
had attempted to block her husband from getting into his vehicle
when he wanted to leave, according to the incident report.
Robby Benson then “grabbed the victim and threw her out of the
way,” causing her to fall on the pavement, the report stated.
While considering whether to sign an arrest warrant Friday
morning, Moore said she saw the pictures but did not think there was
enough information that Benson “did it.” She also said the evidence
presented by State Law Enforcement Division officials did not “rise
to the level necessary to issue a warrant.”
The attorney general’s office said it was convinced its evidence,
which included pictures of injuries to Marcy Benson’s left hand and
right knee, would ensure an arrest warrant and came prepared for a
bond hearing.
Moore was the only Chester County official who remained involved
in the case. To avoid a conflict of interest, the county solicitor
passed the case on to the attorney general’s office. SLED
investigated.
The attorney general’s office said it asked Moore if she needed
to recuse herself. Moore declined. She said she acted impartially in
making her decision.
In South Carolina, criminal domestic violence is a misdemeanor,
and arrest warrants must be approved by a magistrate.
Former state prosecutor and U.S. Attorney Pete Strom said it
appears state officials did everything they could under the law to
obtain a signed arrest warrant.
“If the system has broken down here, it broke down in the judge’s
decision,” he said.
The attorney general’s office says it is preparing to close the
investigation.
“Is the office disappointed in the outcome?” Plowden asked.
“Absolutely. We believe it’s both a sad and a shocking reminder of
what a victim of domestic violence faces in court every day.”
Attorney General Henry McMaster has called domestic violence the
No. 1 crime problem in South Carolina and fought for tougher
domestic violence penalties. He has also begun programs to train law
enforcement officials and judges in the complexity of the issue.
Moore took the state’s criminal domestic violence training in
April 2003, Plowden said. Sheriff Benson is not on record as having
taken the training, but in 2004 he created a full-time domestic
violence investigator’s position.
Benson was elected to his second four-year term in November.The
couple has been married since 1996 and has a 12-year-old son.
Marcy Benson’s attorney declined to comment.
“Marital difficulties are hard for anyone,” said Michael Hemlepp,
the sheriff’s attorney. “They’re especially hard when it gets to the
point of going to court, and this man and woman who could have been
resolving their differences in private are having to do it on the
front page. Frankly, I feel sorry for both of them.” |