Film examines S.C.
schools Poor, rural facilities focus
of documentary By JOHN
MONK News
Columnist
As a judge deliberates whether to order the state to spend more
money on public schools in poor counties, supporters of those
schools are taking their case to the court of public opinion.
Alarmed by crumbling walls, leaky roofs, faulty fire alarms and
unheated classrooms, some of the state’s biggest philanthropists —
Republicans and Democrats — put up more than $75,000 to produce a
58-minute documentary film on conditions in schools in poor, rural
counties.
“We want to catch the conscience of the king,” said Columbia
lawyer John Rainey, the film’s initiator.
Rainey uses the quote from Shakespeare to say that conditions in
some rural schools are so potentially harmful that the state’s
politicians need to be shocked into action. The film’s footage — of
school officials talking of poisonous snakes and sewage in hallways,
and photos of unsafe conditions in schools — will do that, he
hopes.
“When you have children in gloves and jackets in classes where
the temperature is 50 degrees, that’s not acceptable,” Rainey
said.
DVDs and videos of the film, called “Corridor of Shame,” will be
given within a few weeks to the state’s 170 legislators, Gov. Mark
Sanford and community leaders across the state. The $75,000 from the
philanthropists includes the distribution costs.
Rainey said the annual debate over whether more money is needed
for public schools — or whether educators waste money — will
continue. In the meantime, someone needs to spend money immediately
to do things like fix fire alarms, he said.
“We have a tsunami right now in these counties. We can’t give a
few million to them? What is wrong?” Rainey said.
No philanthropist gave more than $5,000 to the film, Rainey said.
Contributors included the Nord Family Foundation, the Self Family
Foundation, the Sisters of Charity Foundation, the Springs Close
Foundation, Gayle Averyt, Kirk Finlay III, Joel Smith, Hayne Hipp,
and Charlotte and Alan Kahn.
Many have political connections. Their open support of
impoverished schools adds a dimension to one of South Carolina’s
longest-running political battles — how to improve public education.
Rainey, for example, is a major fund-raiser for Sanford and U.S.
Sen. Jim DeMint, both Republicans and public school critics.
‘THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES’
“Corridor of Shame” took five months to make. Producers visited
six rural counties, shooting 120 hours of tape, most of it
interviews with teachers, parents and administrators.
Besides documenting dangerous conditions, the film says good
teachers flee poor schools to get higher-paying teaching jobs in
wealthier, neighboring counties. It all adds up to a situation in
which tens of thousands of children face lives limited by an
inferior education, the film’s promoters say.
Many of the conditions the film depicts were aired in testimony
at a 101-day trial last year. In that case, eight poor, rural school
districts sued the state, alleging public education in their
districts doesn’t meet “minimally adequate” education guaranteed by
the state constitution.
Judge Thomas W. Cooper is expected to rule later this year.
However, the case, which began 12 years ago, may not be over for
years. Cooper’s decision will be appealed to the S.C. Supreme Court
by the losing side.
The crux of the dispute is that much money to pay for public
schools comes from local property taxes. Poor, rural counties don’t
have the tax base to improve schools and attract quality
teachers.
No one has put a price tag on how much money would be needed to
upgrade rural education. But it is sure to run into the hundreds of
millions of dollars.
“Corridor of Shame” puts a human face on the testimony heard in
Cooper’s courtroom, said Bud Ferillo, whose Columbia public
relations firm produced the film.
Ferillo said he felt no obligation to put in the film the state’s
contention — that children in poor counties already have an adequate
education. The state also alleges the poverty in many rural counties
is such a handicap to children that putting more money in the
schools won’t make a difference in student achievement.
“Our film certainly is an advocacy piece,” Ferillo said. “But the
facts speak for themselves. Conditions in our rural public schools
cry out for immediate attention.”
‘GOT TO STOP’
Ferillo has submitted the film to ETV in hopes it will run on
statewide television. He has a good shot. ETV board chairman Robert
Rainey contributed to the film.
One of the film’s most powerful moments comes when former state
Commerce Secretary Charlie Way, a multimillionaire Charleston
developer, tells about his car breaking down near a rural school.
When he went to the school to telephone for help, Way was
shocked.
“It was the most deplorable building condition that I have ever
seen in my life,” he exclaims on camera. “This sort of situation has
got to stop!”
U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., tells the camera that rural
school needs “are real. ... Money is not the answer to all problems.
But if you ain’t got it, it’s a good start.”
Ed McMullen, head of the S.C. Policy Council, an influential
conservative think tank, also appears in the film. Several years
ago, while visiting a Florence school, McMullen found sewage in the
hallway. “You have to see it to believe it.”
State Department of Education spokesman Jim Foster said
construction and building maintenance are almost entirely the
responsibility of counties. Poor counties often must choose between
paying teachers or repairing old buildings, he said.
Sanford spokesman Will Folks said the governor’s office has
requested a copy of the film. Folks said the governor is committed
to improving education by offering parents a tax credit to help pay
for their children to change public schools or go to private
schools.
State, federal and local governments spend billions on S.C.
public education, Folks said. Some poor counties could save money by
consolidating multiple school districts, he added. “Money is
obviously not making it through the bureaucracy to where it is
needed.”
Rainey said the debate should stop long enough to help the
children. “If this video doesn’t do it, that says something about
our
character.” |