Even at the last minute, legislative proponents of tort reform were
having to face down the opposition. But after the resolution of a
last-minute roadblock in the House Wednesday, it's finally safe to say the
battle has been won. The changes in the law will go a long way toward more
fairness in the legal system that will be felt primarily by the state's
business interests and its medical profession.
While some consider it nothing short of a miracle that contentious tort
reform is about to be signed into law with the legislative session only
half over, Cam Crawford, executive director of South Carolinians for Tort
Reform, noted that it's a victory that's really been two and a half years
in the making. Tort reform has been on the agenda for that long. Last
year, it died in the Senate after passage by the House early in that
session.
This year, reformers employed a different strategy, dividing the reform
package into two parts: general tort reform and medical malpractice. There
is no question that a change in the Senate rules that provides a
reasonable remedy for the gridlock of the past played a major role in the
relatively speedy compromise in that body on such previously volatile
issues as malpractice financial caps. The compromise set a $350,000 cap on
non-economic damages for a total of three caregivers, setting the
potential maximum at just over $1 million. There is no limit on the
compensation for actual damages.
The general tort reform bill was pushed primarily by business interests
who contended that the state's laws were putting South Carolina at a
competitive disadvantage in attracting industry. They argued convincingly
about the need to tighten laws that allow judge-and-jury shopping by
plaintiffs' attorneys. The statute of limitations on suing contractors
also was reduced from 13 to eight years, bringing South Carolina more in
line with surrounding states. Of prime importance was a new limitation on
the so-called "deep pockets" provision that previously allowed plaintiffs
to collect 100 percent of the damages for a defendant who might be no more
than 2 percent liable. The new rule would require that a defendant be more
than 50 percent liable before being subject to paying all of the damages.
Tougher sanctions against frivolous lawsuits also are a part of the
general tort reform package.
The general tort legislation was ratified on Thursday and now is
sitting on the governor's desk. While the medical malpractice bill is
wrapped up, it won't reach the governor until after Easter. The latter
bill was amended in the Senate Thursday as part of an agreement to resolve
a question raised in the House Wednesday that threatened to delay general
tort reform for weeks.
A compromise was reached after House Speaker David Wilkins took a
strong stance on the delaying tactic, warning that no one was going home
until a settlement was reached. As it turned out, proponents agreed the
safest way to resolve the general tort reform problem was through an
amendment of a related provision in the Senate medical malpractice bill.
The House will ratify the Senate amendment when it returns from a week's
holiday.
Tort reform advocate Crawford praised both Speaker Wilkins and Senate
President Pro Tempore Glenn McConnell for "showing a lot of leadership" on
the measures, along with gratitude for the governor's strong support. Sen.
McConnell said he felt the bodies had done their best to protect all
sides' rights and interests while trying to ensure "affordable, accessible
health care" and competition "in the economic world."
The back-patting is well deserved and should include the concession,
however grudging, by many former opponents that tort reform's time had
finally come.