High court orders stay of Robertson execution
By Andrew Dys The Herald

(Published July 8‚ 2005)

The S.C. Supreme Court on Thursday gave James Robertson a temporary reprieve from execution, which could have come as early as next month.

Robertson has been on death row for six years for the November 1997 beating death of his parents at their Rock Hill home. The five high court justices unanimously granted Robertson's request to halt execution because he plans to file a civil lawsuit against his trial lawyers and prosecutors.

The court last month ordered Robertson's execution to be set after he dropped his appeal. Afterward, Robertson filed court papers stating he intends to allege ineffective counsel and prosecutorial misconduct during his 1999 trial. A jury sentenced him to death for bludgeoning his parents with a hammer and baseball bat.

The S.C. Attorney General's Office, which opposed halting execution, also will oppose any claims Robertson may make in a post-conviction relief lawsuit, said spokesman Mark Plowden.

Legal experts expected the Supreme Court would temporarily halt the execution because allegations over competent counsel involve Constitutional rights. Post-conviction relief lawsuits are routinely filed by criminal defendants but are rarely successful, legal experts say.

Post-conviction relief lawsuits can take as long as a year to be heard, said Joe Savitz, Robertson's former appeals lawyer. Savitz said Thursday he has not talked to Robertson about the ruling but expects Robertson may act as his own lawyer again in civil court.

"If past history is any indication, he'll represent himself," Savitz said.

Robertson's motives for dropping the appeal and then filing a civil suit asking that his conviction be overturned are unclear. Robertson was told by a prosecutor and a judge in February that dropping his appeal could diminish his chances for success in a civil lawsuit.

In the February hearing, Robertson admitted killing Terry and Earl Robertson in November 1997. Prosecutors said during the trial Robertson's motive was greed for killing his father, a Springs Industries executive, and mother, a former teacher.

Tommy Pope, the 16th Circuit solicitor who convicted Robertson, said Thursday Robertson likes the limelight. Pope denies any misconduct but said defendants such as Robertson have the right to ask for relief regardless of motive.

The Supreme Court assigned Greenville Circuit Court Judge John Few to Robertson's case. Few must hold a hearing in the next month to see whether Robertson wants a civil court lawyer, Thursday's order states. Robertson represented himself in court in February when he was found mentally competent to be executed.

Robertson is considered indigent by the state and will get a court-appointed lawyer if he wants one.

Andrew Dys •329-4065

adys@heraldonline.com

Copyright © 2005 The Herald, Rock Hill, South Carolina