NewsShopsAutosJobsJacksonvilleCharlestonBeaufortSavannahAtlantaAthensGreenvilleCharlotteColumbiaAugusta

home

news

obits

classifieds

cityguide

columnists

weather

services

marketplace

search

sitemap

contactus



Advertisers







Mostly Clear • 73° • from the WSW at 9 MPH • Extended Forecast Here
Local News Web posted Sunday, April 11, 2004

Voices of Carolina: Put the parents in charge

By Ashley Landess
Special to the Carolina Morning News

The author, Ashley Landess, is vice president for public affairs of the South Carolina Policy Council Education Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization in Columbia. For more information, visit www.scpolicycouncil.com

When the Accountability Act passed in 1998, it increased standards and assessments and laid out overall guidelines for schools to succeed - in other words, goals that should be a given for public education.

So, of course, there was opposition from panicked politicians and career bureaucrats.

In spite of their doom-and-gloom forecasts about the "dangers" of higher standards, here we are six years later and public schools have miraculously survived.

But just surviving is not acceptable - South Carolina schools have not moved forward fast enough. One third of our eighth-graders cannot read, and that number is even higher for African Americans. Half of our children cannot make it out of high school in four years. Too many never do. Our SAT scores remain at the bottom.

Spending more money as a singular strategy to raise achievement simply has not worked.

It is time to stop living in the past when it comes to education reform. Gov. Mark Sanford campaigned on an idea that he knew worked in other states - expanded choice in education. In other words, while we work on making our schools better, we cannot afford to sacrifice the opportunities of the children in them.

Education reform leaders in the House and Senate finally have the support they need in the governor's office to move forward. The Put Parents in Charge Act, sponsored by Speaker Pro Tempore Doug Smith, Rep. Lewis Vaughn and Sen. David Thomas along with many others, presents South Carolina parents with the option to take a tax credit and spend it at the school they believe is best for their child.

Naturally, opponents of choice toss out the same argument they make any time change is suggested - how their cash flow will suffer because of education reform. They claim that school choice takes money out of public schools.

That would not be the case at all. In fact, according to Clemson economist Cotton Lindsay, per-pupil spending will actually increase faster under Put Parents in Charge than without it.

The Put Parents in Charge Act is not a new idea. In fact, plans to let parents choose their children's school are working all over the country, and have been for decades.

The public schools in Milwaukee have not fallen apart under the plan they have had in place for more than a decade. Maine and Vermont, both rural states, have offered school choice plans that include private schools for more than 100 years. And in Arizona, low-income children finally have choices they never had before, and the public schools have hardly crumbled.

School choice opponents know that public schools in other states are faring just fine under choice plans. Unfortunately, those folks are the same ones who fought accountability - they simply do not like change.

They also incorrectly assume that if a child goes to private school, they'll have less money. The average per-pupil expenditure in South Carolina is $8,324, while the median independent school tuition is $3,115. The tax credit will be around $4,000. Clearly, in many cases it will cost less to educate a child at an independent school than at a public one.

It is important to note that not all the dollars would leave the school - the majority of local funds would ultimately go back to the public schools, and all of the federal dollars would remain. In other words, schools will keep some of the money without the cost of educating the children who choose other schools.

Public schools will not lose money, but this debate should not even center on that question. According to the National Center on Education Statistics, South Carolina ranked 27th in the nation for per-pupil spending. At the same time, the U.S. Department of Commerce shows S.C. ranked 43rd for per-capita income. In other words, our citizens make less money but spend more on education than in other states.

Unfortunately, parents in many school districts are not seeing the results. They have a right to make good decisions for their children. Other states put parents in charge a long time ago. We cannot afford to lag any further behind.

Events:
May

S M T W T F S






1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 26
27
28
29
30
31





click on date

Local News

• Jasper Audubon taking flight

• Budget approved; residents' tax bills could drop

• First Jasper schools construction bid awarded

• Married couple plead guilty in man's disappearance

• Council gets no-tax increase budget

• Sitting safer

• Child wreck victim identified

• Town interviews manager candidates

• Dead man identified

• Fresh pickin's

• It's all fun in Bluffton

• Editorial: Bus system seems headed in right direction

• Harrell: Another trip down I-95

• Bremer: Time to get into the swim of things

• Vox Carolina

• Upcoming events

• Calendar of events




Features
Coastal Autos

Coastal Golf

Worldcom Classic

Football NOW

SEC Fanatic




Copyright 2004 Carolina Morning News. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.
Optimized for 800x600 screen resolution.