Customer Service: Subscribe Now | Manage your account | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Help
 GreenvilleOnline.com ? Weather ? Calendar ? Jobs ? Cars ? Homes ? Apartments ? Classifieds ? Shopping ? Dating
 
  • Search the Upstate:
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Greenville News
305 S. Main St.
PO Box 1688
Greenville, SC 29602

(864) 298-4100
(800) 800-5116

Subscription services
(800) 736-7136

Newspaper in Educ.
Community Involvement
Our history
Ethics principles

Send:
A story idea
A press release
A letter to the editor

Find:
A news story
An editor or reporter
An obituary

Photo reprints:
Submit a request

RSS Feeds
Top Stories, Breaking News
Add to My Yahoo!
Local News
Add to My Yahoo!
Business
Add to My Yahoo!
Sports
Add to My Yahoo!
Opinion
Add to My Yahoo!
Entertainment
Add to My Yahoo!

Get news on your smartphone!
Get the latest headlines and stories from The Greenville News on your smartphone or PDA.

[ Point here ] [ Learn more ]

Advertisement
Thursday, November 9    |    Upstate South Carolina News, Sports and Information

Sanford claims 'mandate,' but some skeptical
Governor touts victory margin; critics question commitment to working with Legislature

Published: Thursday, November 9, 2006 - 6:00 am


By Dan Hoover
STAFF WRITER
dchoover@greenvillenews.com


What's your view? Click here to add your comment to this story.

Flushed with victory, Republican Gov. Mark Sanford headed Wednesday toward a second and final term with what he said was a "mandate" for change and reform.

"When you beat an opponent by double digits in a general election, that fits my definition of mandate for something," said Drew McKissick, a Columbia public affairs executive and conservative activist.

House Speaker Bobby Harrell, R-Charleston, heard a public that "is telling us they wanted him to stay governor and I take that to mean they want us to work with him, and we intend to try to do so."

For Sanford, "mandate" and "lame duck" may not be mutually exclusive terms, but that's far from a universally held opinion. Some legislators met the mandate comment with high skepticism and doubts that Sanford is prepared to work with them after four years of conflict and an insult or two.

Advertisement

Rep. Dan Cooper, R-Piedmont, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee who has often opposed Sanford, said, "I don't know it's a mandate. Carroll Campbell got more than 60 percent (for re-election). That was a mandate."

A Sanford mandate would almost certainly take the form of a renewed push for streamlining state government with fewer elective positions and a less "transformative" version of his school choice plan.

Sanford defeated Democratic state Sen. Tommy Moore with more than 55 percent of the votes as his Republican Party further tightened its grip on South Carolina.

"If you look at what's been passed on to me, the first time in 16 years anyone has passed the 54 (percent) mark in running for governor or the Senate ... there is a significant mandate," Sanford said in an interview just after midnight Wednesday.

Mandate or not, as Democrats fell short yet again, Sanford achieved his key goals:

  • A second term, with a solid margin.

  • A voting majority on the Budget and Control Board through the re-election of Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom and Thomas Ravenel's defeat of incumbent Democratic Treasurer Grady Patterson.

    "That's a huge event," said U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a Sanford friend and former state lawmaker, because it gives the governor a "like-minded" majority.

    Sanford has chafed at often being on the short side of 3-2 votes, as he and Eckstrom were outvoted by a coalition of Patterson and Republicans Cooper and Sen. Hugh Leatherman of Florence, Senate Finance chairman.

    To Rep. Harry Cato, R-Travelers Rest, chairman of the Labor, Commerce and Industry Committee, it was "a convincing vote."

    Rick Beltram, the Spartanburg County GOP chairman, suggested that legislators take notice of Sanford's margin.

    But Jim Hodges, the Democratic governor defeated by Sanford in 2002, said that while Sanford achieved a solid victory, "It's hard to describe it as a mandate" along the lines of Dick Riley's education penny, Carroll Campbell's government restructuring, or his own lottery initiative.

    No dominant issue, no mandate, Hodges said.

    "Politicians have to weigh carefully what is a mandate," said Sen. David Thomas, R-Fountain Inn. "The fact that he's a Republican (in South Carolina) carried him to victory.

    "Unless he changes his method of operation, he's going to run into that same brick wall," Thomas said, explaining that Sanford needs to stop fighting and belittling the Legislature and spend more time in serious give and take, or "they'll just do what they think they ought to be doing."

    Chip Felkel, a Greenville public affairs consultant and veteran of numerous GOP campaigns, said Sanford used money and incumbency to wage a "super campaign," but questioned the mandate notion.

    "I don't see how. Thomas Ravenel gets credit for his own win after two statewide races. Education candidate Karen Floyd was the poster child for Sanford's education views. Mandates require coattails, and there isn't any evidence of such. He is to be congratulated. But now, the pressure is really, really on. He has to deliver, no excuses, plain and simple," Felkel said.

    Sanford ran fifth among nine statewide Republican candidates.

    Tim Brett, a former Campbell aide now a Greenville public relations executive who headed Upstate Republicans for Moore, scoffed at Sanford's mandate claim.

    "I've been told by Republican legislators that I know that he's a lame duck governor immediately in January, that's the way they're going to treat him," Brett said.

    Turnout was lower than in 2002, by 31,784 votes, but Sanford's margin almost doubled to 110,206 votes. Tuesday, he carried 22 of 46 counties, down one from four years ago.

    While his overall numbers were strong, there were signs of discontent.

    In heavily Republican Lexington County, where Sanford won by more than 22,000 votes the first time around, he did so by little more than half that on Tuesday. Newberry, a county he carried in 2002, he lost this time.

    Sanford lost both counties in his primary with Oscar Lovelace, a family doctor from Prosperity in Newberry County. The governor also alienated some in Lexington with his veto of authorization for a heart center there.

    But Greenville, another county where there was some disenchantment with the governor, provided a third of his statewide margin with a 33,418-vote cushion, improving on his 2002 showing.


  • Article tools

     E-mail this story
     Print this story
     Get breaking news, briefings e-mailed to you

    Related
    STREAMING AUDIO:
    Audio: Sen. Jake Knotts discusses Gov. Mark Sanford's win

    Related news from the Web


    Sponsored links

     

    StoryChat Post a CommentPost a Comment   View all CommentsView All Comments

    O.P. Inyunated Why is always "Sanford won't work with the legislature?" Why doesn't anyone ever ask why the entrenched, egotistical, turf-protecting, Good Ol' Boys over in the legislature, don't try to work with the Governor to change the way things have been done for centuries? How's that system working out for South Carolina?
    The legislative control of the state was set up by the rural land barons of the 19th century to make sure that the white, big land owners controlled the state government. Isn't it time we have an executive branch that can lead while the legislature debates policy? That seems to work in 49 other states.

    O.P. Inyunated Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:20 am

    AlanS If you really fall for that stuff then you got the ineffective kind of governor you deserve.

    AlanS Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:17 am

    PersonfromGreer Bring on some more piggies! Pork and Barrel (along with their pig poop) were perfect symbols of what goes on in Columbia.

    Governor Sanford stands against legislators wasting our money by buying votes in their home districts with it. And the two legged piggies down there don't like the attention.

    So bring out the light and bring on somre more piggies!

    PersonfromGreer Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:02 am

    AlanS We live in a state where 78% of the population just voted against equal rights for gays, yet Sanford only got 55% of the vote. That's hardly a mandate. Of course Bush barely squeaked by with 51% in the last election (smallest margin for any war time incumbant) and he called it a mandate too and look where that lead, illegal wiretaps and violations of the Geneva Conventions. And now, like Bush, Sandford is on record saying this so-called mandate was from God. Just what we need, more leaders thinking God is supporting their bad decisions. Did God tell him to bring livestock into the statehouse? If God was leading Sanford, seems like he'd at least help him to realize he doesn't have to dress his kids the same way all the time. That's just freaky.

    AlanS Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:53 am

    riskman Sanford won by more (no pun intended) than either Bauer, Ravenel, Eckstrom, or Rex/Floyd). These were the marquee races. Who cares about agriculture commiss? He was the top of the ticket, therefore it's obvious he trounced his opponent. I'll vote for a Sanford mandate anyday.

    riskman Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:47 am

    Post a CommentPost a Comment   View all CommentsView All Comments

    Advertisement


    GannettGANNETT FOUNDATION

    Copyright 2005 The Greenville News.
    Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, updated June 7, 2005.

    USA WEEKEND USA TODAY