By Dan Hoover STAFF WRITER dchoover@greenvillenews.com
|
 What's
your view? Click
here to add your comment to this story.
| |
Flushed with victory, Republican Gov. Mark Sanford headed
Wednesday toward a second and final term with what he said was a
"mandate" for change and reform.
"When you beat an opponent by double digits in a general
election, that fits my definition of mandate for something," said
Drew McKissick, a Columbia public affairs executive and conservative
activist.
House Speaker Bobby Harrell, R-Charleston, heard a public that
"is telling us they wanted him to stay governor and I take that to
mean they want us to work with him, and we intend to try to do so."
For Sanford, "mandate" and "lame duck" may not be mutually
exclusive terms, but that's far from a universally held opinion.
Some legislators met the mandate comment with high skepticism and
doubts that Sanford is prepared to work with them after four years
of conflict and an insult or two.
Advertisement
|
 |
Rep. Dan Cooper, R-Piedmont, chairman of the Ways and Means
Committee who has often opposed Sanford, said, "I don't know it's a
mandate. Carroll Campbell got more than 60 percent (for
re-election). That was a mandate."
A Sanford mandate would almost certainly take the form of a
renewed push for streamlining state government with fewer elective
positions and a less "transformative" version of his school choice
plan.
Sanford defeated Democratic state Sen. Tommy Moore with more than
55 percent of the votes as his Republican Party further tightened
its grip on South Carolina.
"If you look at what's been passed on to me, the first time in 16
years anyone has passed the 54 (percent) mark in running for
governor or the Senate ... there is a significant mandate," Sanford
said in an interview just after midnight Wednesday.
Mandate or not, as Democrats fell short yet again, Sanford
achieved his key goals:
A second term, with a solid margin.
A voting majority on the Budget and Control Board through the
re-election of Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom and Thomas
Ravenel's defeat of incumbent Democratic Treasurer Grady Patterson.
"That's a huge event," said U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a
Sanford friend and former state lawmaker, because it gives the
governor a "like-minded" majority.
Sanford has chafed at often being on the short side of 3-2 votes,
as he and Eckstrom were outvoted by a coalition of Patterson and
Republicans Cooper and Sen. Hugh Leatherman of Florence, Senate
Finance chairman.
To Rep. Harry Cato, R-Travelers Rest, chairman of the Labor,
Commerce and Industry Committee, it was "a convincing vote."
Rick Beltram, the Spartanburg County GOP chairman, suggested that
legislators take notice of Sanford's margin.
But Jim Hodges, the Democratic governor defeated by Sanford in
2002, said that while Sanford achieved a solid victory, "It's hard
to describe it as a mandate" along the lines of Dick Riley's
education penny, Carroll Campbell's government restructuring, or his
own lottery initiative.
No dominant issue, no mandate, Hodges said.
"Politicians have to weigh carefully what is a mandate," said
Sen. David Thomas, R-Fountain Inn. "The fact that he's a Republican
(in South Carolina) carried him to victory.
"Unless he changes his method of operation, he's going to run
into that same brick wall," Thomas said, explaining that Sanford
needs to stop fighting and belittling the Legislature and spend more
time in serious give and take, or "they'll just do what they think
they ought to be doing."
Chip Felkel, a Greenville public affairs consultant and veteran
of numerous GOP campaigns, said Sanford used money and incumbency to
wage a "super campaign," but questioned the mandate notion.
"I don't see how. Thomas Ravenel gets credit for his own win
after two statewide races. Education candidate Karen Floyd was the
poster child for Sanford's education views. Mandates require
coattails, and there isn't any evidence of such. He is to be
congratulated. But now, the pressure is really, really on. He has to
deliver, no excuses, plain and simple," Felkel said.
Sanford ran fifth among nine statewide Republican candidates.
Tim Brett, a former Campbell aide now a Greenville public
relations executive who headed Upstate Republicans for Moore,
scoffed at Sanford's mandate claim.
"I've been told by Republican legislators that I know that he's a
lame duck governor immediately in January, that's the way they're
going to treat him," Brett said.
Turnout was lower than in 2002, by 31,784 votes, but Sanford's
margin almost doubled to 110,206 votes. Tuesday, he carried 22 of 46
counties, down one from four years ago.
While his overall numbers were strong, there were signs of
discontent.
In heavily Republican Lexington County, where Sanford won by more
than 22,000 votes the first time around, he did so by little more
than half that on Tuesday. Newberry, a county he carried in 2002, he
lost this time.
Sanford lost both counties in his primary with Oscar Lovelace, a
family doctor from Prosperity in Newberry County. The governor also
alienated some in Lexington with his veto of authorization for a
heart center there.
But Greenville, another county where there was some
disenchantment with the governor, provided a third of his statewide
margin with a 33,418-vote cushion, improving on his 2002 showing.
|