NewsShopsAutosJobsJacksonvilleCharlestonBeaufortSavannahAtlantaAthensGreenvilleCharlotteColumbiaAugusta

home

news

obits

classifieds

cityguide

columnists

weather

services

marketplace

search

sitemap

contactus



Advertisers







Mostly Clear • 71° • from the ESE at 3 MPH • Extended Forecast Here
Local News Web posted Wednesday, October 27, 2004

Candidates spar over transfer fee

HILTON HEAD ISLAND: Chalk, Wynn disagree over island's lucrative loophole.

By Frank Morris
Carolina Morning News

Republican Richard Chalk has accused Greg Wynn, his independent opponent in next Tuesday's State House District 123 election, of distorting his position on the real estate transfer fee in campaign literature.

Chalk said Monday that Wynn's campaign stepped over the line by incorrectly stating, in an e-mailed campaign advertisement, that "Chalk has vowed to eliminate the transfer fee."

Wynn, responding Tuesday, said he stood by the statement. He said it was a fair interpretation of the position Chalk gave for a June 7 Carolina Morning News story, "even though (Chalk) didn't flat out say that" he vowed to eliminate the fee.

A special exclusion in a state law passed in 1991 makes the town of Hilton Head Island the only local government in South Carolina that can charge a fee on real estate sales. The Town Council uses revenue from its 0.25 percent transfer fee, started in 1990, to buy land for growth control, preserving open space and building parks.

The exemption from legislation blocking local real estate transfer fees everywhere else in the state was won by then state Sen. Holly Cork of Beaufort County.

Wynn, a small businessman, said he is a strong supporter of the transfer fee program and would support passing legislation giving other local governments the same option.

Chalk, a commercial real estate broker, said that while he is philosophically opposed to the transfer fee, he has never vowed to eliminate it.

"My position on it is that it's a non-issue. It's only an issue because (Wynn) has made it an issue," Chalk said.

He said he would not rule out the possibility of someday backing legislation against Hilton Head's fee, "because one day the people might say, 'We've got all the parks we need ... and we don't need this tax anymore.'

"What I'm saying is that, for now, it's not an issue." Chalk said.

"I just don't want to be held down to a pledge. To me, to say 'never' is never. I don't have any plans to do anything. As far as I'm concerned, it's not an issue. If folks someday want to make it an issue, that's a horse of a different color."

Tuesday, to clarify his position, Chalk said, "I would never initiate an effort to eliminate it" unless the Town Council asked him to do that.

Also Tuesday, Mayor Tom Peeples said has endorsed Wynn's candidacy for several reasons, including Wynn's support for Hilton Head's transfer fee and Chalk's June statement that "he was philosophically opposed to the real estate transfer fee and wouldn't go after it his first term."

The Hilton Head community has shown strong support for the transfer fee in referendums, and Chalk's position "tells me he doesn't know as much about our community as he needs to," Peeples said. "I don't want anybody (in Columbia) who is opposed to a real estate transfer fee in any way, shape or form."

Chalk said Tuesday that House District 123 Rep. JoAnne Gilham has endorsed him and his campaign Tuesday mailed a copy of her support letter to voters.

Gilham, a Republican, did not seek re-election in order to honor a pledge to serve no more than three terms. She was not available for comment Tuesday afternoon.

Wynn said the June newspaper report on what Chalk said "speaks for itself" and justified the statement in the e-mailed advertisement and a similar statement in a Wynn campaign brochure.

The earlier news article reported that Chalk, when asked whether other local governments should get rights to impose property transfer fees like Hilton Head's, said the fee "is a hugely popular thing here, but we're taxing a special segment of the population to benefit everybody who lives here."

He said he would probably oppose expanding the tax option, based on philosophical grounds.

Asked if he would seek to repeal Hilton Head's exemption, he said, "Not in my first term," when he would have "too many fish to fry." However, "philosophically, I am concerned about it," Chalk said in June.

Wynn said, "If you're philosophically concerned or opposed to something, you're not going to defend it.

"I think he's vowed to eliminate it on the state level. He's indicated he would vote against expanding it. I guess we're talking semantics here," Wynn said.

"Mr. Chalk has stated he's philosophically opposed to the fee, won't vote to give (the ability) to other communities and - while he would not vote to rescind it in his first term - he has not ruled out the possibility in a future term."

Wynn said his intent was not to exaggerate Chalk's stance but to "show his lack of foundation in this community and what this fee has meant to the community."

The transfer fee program has allowed the town to develop a public parks system and to protect open space from development, Wynn said. "I think it's something we as a community should value and protect and promote."

He said it would not be a campaign issue if Chalk would come out and said, "I support this fee; I'll defend this fee; and I'll be glad to give other local communities the opportunity to have this fee in their tool box."

Chalk said Tuesday afternoon that "I would say I supported it three times from my pocketbook when I bought a piece of property on Hilton Head." And, he added, "I've said I will not independently go and initiate anything (to repeal Hilton Head's fee), which is what (Wynn's) saying I'm going to do."

Peeples, who won the nonpartisan mayoral race three times since 1995, also is a Republican. He said he also endorsed Wynn "because he has been in the community for 23 years and has given back to the community through his work with the schools and through Rotary."

The mayor said Wynn also gained his support by taking a stand in favor of the 1 percent capital project sales tax plan up for a referendum vote on Tuesday. Chalk has taken a neutral stand on the referendum.

"What we need is someone who is going to go to Columbia and not take the expedient path of no comment but will stand up for what we need," Peeples said.

Chalk said he was not taking a position on the sales tax referendum because "it's already an issue before the voters, and the people will decide, and I've got to go to Columbia and do the best to represent the interests of my constituents."

Wynn said, "I guess that's the politically prudent thing to do. I think the voters of Hilton Head deserve to know how officials stand on issues that affect the community."

Reporter Frank Morris can be reached at 785-7470 or frank.morris@lowcountrynow.com

Events:
October

S M T W T F S





1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 28
29
30
31






click on date

Local News

• Former football star dead in murder-suicide

• $46 million may fall short for new schools

• Candidates spar over transfer fee

• County expands Okatie land holdings

• Vox Carolina

• Jasper gears up for cancer fight

• Pupils' perfect poetry

• Fire safety made fun

• Editorial: County Council members show themselves the money

• Letters to the Editor: Why St. Helena continues to fight

• Education briefs

• Homework

• Youth sports report

• Vecinos: Full moon madness

• Vecinos briefs

• Input sought for project

• Upcoming events

• Events/Eventos

• Lowcountry calendar




Features
Coastal Autos

Coastal Golf

Worldcom Classic

Football NOW

SEC Fanatic




Copyright 2004 Carolina Morning News. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.
Optimized for 800x600 screen resolution.