S.C.
GOVERNMENT
Changes needed to make state more
effective
By Charles Smith
South Carolina is a beautiful state populated by industrious
people. But South Carolina trails the nation in per capita income
and high-school graduation and leads the nation in violent crime,
infant mortality and motor-vehicle deaths. These rankings are, in
part, the result of problems within our state government.
S.C. government traditionally has had a strong legislative branch
and a weak executive branch.
Our legislature has routinely created independent boards and
commissions to administer portions of the government. The result is
a fragmented assemblage of approximately 65 overlapping state
agencies.
Over time, each independent agency has developed its own agenda
and its own constituency. This has resulted in costly duplication of
efforts and, at the same time, less than acceptable levels of
service. Being independent, these agencies are not sufficiently
accountable to citizens and taxpayers.
South Carolina elected Mark Sanford governor to change the
attitude in Columbia.
Changing attitude is the first step toward changing results.
Sanford's desire for fundamental changes led to the formation of
the [2003] Management, Accountability and Performance Commission.
The commission's report identified specific changes to enhance
accountability and performance of state government to better serve
S.C. citizens.
In some areas, a change of attitude is beginning to be seen.
Authorization for the sale of surplus Department of Mental Health
property on Bull Street in Columbia and the sale of the money-losing
State Ports Authority terminal in Beaufort are welcomed,
long-overdue actions.
The most recent session of the General Assembly made progress by
addressing the deficit inherited from prior years, providing funding
for Medicaid from recurring sources and avoiding additional raids on
trust funds. Unfortunately, legislators did not make significant
progress on restructuring overlapping state agencies or prioritizing
state spending.
Several bills to implement parts of the Management,
Accountability and Performance Commission's recommendations were
introduced in the most recent legislative session. But none
passed.
Legislators received the dubious distinction of being awarded
Citizens Against Government Waste's Porker of the Month award in
June for overriding almost all of Sanford's 106 vetoes. The award
specifically mentioned $500,000 of equipment for a
Florence-Darlington Technical College building that has not been
built or funded, $380,000 per year for stadium expansion to
accommodate a Palmetto Bowl football game in Charleston and $250,000
for the Freedom Weekend Aloft balloon festival in Anderson.
Are we satisfied with the results produced by the status quo, or
do we want a more efficient and more accountable state
government?
The next session of the General Assembly can make government
reform a reality. Bills already have been prepared to consolidate
agency support services such as procurement, finance and personnel
to improve efficiency and economy. By clustering similar agencies
together within the executive branch, we can both reduce duplication
of efforts and improve the quality of services. Bills also have been
prepared to allow S.C. voters to decide whether the secretary of
state, secretary of agriculture, adjutant general and other elective
officers should remain independent of the executive branch.
Legislators should approve these bills in 2005.
Change South Carolina Now is a grass-roots citizen group that
works for positive changes in S.C. government. To learn more about
Change South Carolina Now and some of the things you can do to
support change, go to http://www.changescnow.com/.
The writer lives in Georgetown.
|