DOT board plans
review of agency Study will focus on
improving operations The
Associated Press
The state Department of Transportation Commission will seek an
independent review of agency operations in an attempt to save
taxpayers’ money and improve the management of nearly 42,000 miles
of roads and 8,200 bridges.
The commission this week also gave a vote of confidence to the
agency’s executive director. Both actions, commissioners said, were
prompted by a critical letter written last month by commission
chairman Tee Hooper.
In the letter, Hooper questioned the agency’s management and said
he would ask executive director Elizabeth Mabry to resign if he had
the authority.
The letter detailed several allegations, including:
• That costly sports utility
vehicles were supplied to high-level employees
• That the agency hadn’t claimed
more than $145 million available in federal funding
• That the department wasted money
by sending 260 employees to a bike and pedestrian conference in
Myrtle Beach
Mabry has denied the allegations, and lawmakers rallied to her
defense, sending petitions of support.
After a closed-door meeting with Mabry, the commissioners voted
6-0 to “publicly acknowledge their support” for the executive
director. There was no discussion, and Hooper, who only votes in the
event of a tie, didn’t vote or comment.
Commissioner Marion Carnell then asked the board to approve a
resolution seeking “an independent evaluation” of the agency’s
operations “with the intent of showing us how we can do it
better.”
The proposal gave no details as to who would do the review, how
much it would cost or exactly what they would look at. The motion
also passed unanimously without any discussion.
Hooper said he welcomed the independent review.
“Looking into the issues that have been raised is an appropriate
thing to do,” he said. “It helps clear the air.”
Gov. Mark Sanford’s spokesman, Will Folks, said the review is a
good idea, but the board should have spelled out how it would be
done. “It would be a bit more comforting to have a clear sense of
who would be conducting that inquiry.”
Carnell said the review would look at Hooper’s concerns but that
doesn’t mean the commissioners think anyone at the agency has
intentionally done something
wrong. |