Camera bill still
stuck at red light Committee refuses
to OK legislation aimed at slamming brakes on stoplight
violators HENRY
EICHEL Columbia
Bureau
COLUMBIA - Even though police in the
state's largest cities keep asking S.C. lawmakers to let them use
cameras to catch people running red lights, opponents on Thursday
managed for the second-straight year to block legislation giving
local governments that option.
"It's a libertarian thing; this happens every time, the same
people," said a disappointed Sen. Scott Richardson, R-Beaufort,
after the Senate Transportation Committee refused, by a 5-4 vote, to
send his bill to the Senate floor.
Under the bill, it would be local government's choice to install
the cameras, which would have to capture images of both the light
and the vehicle's license plate. The fine could be no more than
$100, and the violation wouldn't be reported to the driver's
insurance company.
Charlotte has 20 red light cameras at intersections with a
history of serious wrecks. Signs tell drivers the cameras are there.
Since the N.C. legislature allowed the city in 1998 to install the
cameras, Charlotte officials say, crashes on the monitored streets
have dropped 57 percent.
Richardson's bill made it out of committee a year ago, but
languished on the Senate floor without ever being voted on. This
year, the bill failed to make it even that far, as opponents raised
hypothetical questions from all angles.
Sen. Hugh Leatherman, R-Florence, asked about somebody who pulls
into an intersection to make a left turn and who must wait for
oncoming traffic to clear. What if the light turns red while she's
waiting?
Richardson explained that the camera's trip mechanism acts at the
beginning of the intersection, not the middle. He said, "It wouldn't
take your picture."
Leatherman persisted. "But what if you've got a vehicle following
that vehicle?" he said. "It could trip that thing."
Sen. David Hawkins, R-Spartanburg, then questioned a section of
the bill that said cameras could be used only to record noncriminal
violations. "How about if it spots a drunk driver?"
Richardson replied that the cameras wouldn't be able to determine
blood alcohol levels.
Sen. Linda Short, D-Chester, said she has some small towns in her
district that are well-known speed traps. "Could it be possible,"
she asked, "for one of those towns to purchase one of these cameras
and put it in an unlikely place for a light to be?"
Sen. Ray Cleary, R-Georgetown, a supporter of the bill, expressed
frustration at the stream of hypotheticals. "What if the sky is
orange and there's snow coming down?" he said. "This is just a red
light
issue." |